Pakistan's Army Chief with Saudi Crown Prince |
The Washington Post broke
the story [1] on Wednesday, January 23, that satellite images suggested
Saudi Arabia had constructed its first-known ballistic missile factory. Paul
Sonne, reporting for The Washington Post, notes: “If operational, the suspected
factory at a missile base in al-Watah, southwest of Riyadh, would allow Saudi
Arabia to manufacture its own ballistic missiles.”
The report adds: “The ballistic missile manufacturing
complex — which satellite images suggest broke ground in 2013 when King
Salman was defense minister — highlights the nation’s intention to make its own
advanced missiles after years of seeking to purchase them abroad.”
How the Saudis obtained the technological expertise
necessary to build the facility is unclear, according to the report, though one
potential supplier could be China, which has sold ballistic missiles to Saudi
Arabia in the past and has helped supply ballistic missile production
capabilities to other nations, particularly to Pakistan, whose military has
forged deep institutional ties with the Saudi royal family since the 1980s.
Regarding Saudi Arabia’s fervid desire to acquire nuclear
and ballistic missile capabilities to match Iran’s military superiority in the
Middle East region, the Washington Post report is not the only instance of its
kind. David Sanger and William Broad reported
in The New York Times [2] in November that before Saudi Arabia’s Crown
Prince Mohammed bin Salman was implicated in the killing of Jamal Khashoggi at
the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on October 2, American intelligence agencies
were trying to solve a separate mystery: was the prince laying the groundwork
for building an atomic bomb?
According to the New York Times report, the Saudi heir
apparent had been overseeing negotiations with the US Energy Department to get
Washington to sell designs for nuclear power plants to the kingdom. The deal
was worth upward of $80 billion, depending on how many plants Saudi Arabia
decided to build.
But there was a hitch: Saudi Arabia insisted on producing
its own nuclear fuel. Such fuel can be used for benign or military purposes: if
uranium is enriched to 4 percent purity, it can fuel a power plant; at 90
percent, it can be used for a bomb. Saudi Arabia has vast uranium reserves and
there are currently five nuclear research centers operating in the kingdom.
The report further noted that the Crown Prince set off
alarms when he declared in a CBS News interview in March last year, “Saudi
Arabia does not want to acquire any nuclear bomb, but without a doubt, if Iran
developed a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as soon as possible.”
Regarding Saudi Arabia’s clandestine nuclear activities, in
November 2013, BBC’s defense correspondent, Mark Urban, published a report [3] that
Pakistan’s military had made a secret deal with Saudi Arabia that in the event
of Iran developing a nuclear weapon, Pakistan would provide ready-made nuclear
warheads along with delivery systems to Saudi Arabia.
Similarly, in 2004, it emerged during the investigation of
Pakistan’s top nuclear scientist, Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan, dubbed as “the father
of Pakistan’s nuclear program,” that he had sold centrifuge designs to Iran,
Libya and North Korea.
Additionally, in recent years, Pakistan’s defense production
industry, with Chinese assistance, has emerged as one of the most sophisticated
military-industrial complex in the region. Not only does it provide
state-of-the-art conventional weapons to the oil-rich Gulf states, but
according to a May 2014 AFP report [4],
Pakistan-made weapons were used in large quantities in Sri Lanka’s Northern
Offensive of 2008-09 against the Tamil Tiger rebels.
Moreover, in May last year, Pakistan’s former army chief,
General Raheel Sharif, was appointed to lead a 40-member military alliance of
Muslim nations dubbed as “The Muslim NATO.” Although the ostensible purpose of
the alliance is to combat terrorism, in fact the alliance of Sunni Muslim
nations was cobbled together by Saudi Arabia as a counterweight to Iran’s
meddling in the Arab World, which Saudi Arabia regards as its own sphere of
influence.
Furthermore, it’s worth noting that Pakistan’s military and
Saudi Arabia have forged very deep and institutionalized ties. Thousands of
Pakistani retired and serving army officers work on deputations in the Gulf
Arab States. And during the 1980s, when Saudi Arabia lacked an efficient
intelligence set-up, Pakistan’s Inter-services Intelligence (ISI) virtually
played the role of Saudi Arabia’s foreign intelligence service.
Notwithstanding, the Trump administration recently announced
the most stringent set of sanctions against Iran to appease Benjamin Netanyahu.
Donald Trump has repeatedly said during the last two years that the Iran
nuclear deal signed by the Obama administration in 2015 was an “unfair deal”
that gave concessions to Iran without giving anything in return to the US.
Unfortunately, there is a grain of truth in Trump’s
statements because the Obama administration signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan
of Action (JCPOA) with Iran in July 2015 under pressure, as Washington had
bungled in its Middle East policy and it wanted Iran’s cooperation in Syria and
Iraq to get a face-saving.
In order to understand how the Obama administration bungled
in Syria and Iraq, we should bear the background of Washington’s Middle East
policy during the recent years in mind. The eight-year-long conflict in Syria
that gave birth to scores of militant groups, including the Islamic State, and
after the conflict spilled across the border into neighboring Iraq in early
2014 was directly responsible for the spate of Islamic State-inspired terror
attacks in Europe from 2015 to 2017.
Since the beginning of the Syrian conflict in August 2011 to
June 2014, when the Islamic State overran Mosul and Anbar in Iraq, an informal
pact existed between the Western powers, their regional Sunni allies and
jihadists of the Middle East against the Shi’a Iranian axis. In accordance with
the pact, militants were trained and armed in the training camps located in the
border regions of Turkey and Jordan to battle the Syrian government.
This arrangement of an informal pact between the Western powers
and the jihadists of the Middle East against the Iranian axis worked well up to
August 2014, when the Obama Administration made a volte-face on its previous
regime change policy in Syria and began conducting air strikes against one
group of Sunni militants battling the Syrian government, the Islamic State,
after the latter overstepped its mandate in Syria and overran Mosul and Anbar
in Iraq from where the US had withdrawn its troops only a couple of years ago
in December 2011.
After this reversal of policy in Syria by the Western powers
and the subsequent Russian military intervention on the side of the Syrian
government in September 2015, the momentum of jihadists’ expansion in Syria and
Iraq stalled, and they felt that their Western patrons had committed a
treachery against the Sunni jihadists’ cause, that’s why they were infuriated
and rose up in arms to exact revenge for this betrayal.
If we look at the chain of events, the timing of the spate
of terror attacks against the West was critical: the Islamic State overran
Mosul in June 2014, the Obama Administration began conducting air strikes
against the Islamic State’s targets in Iraq and Syria in August 2014, and after
a lull of almost a decade since the Madrid and London bombings in 2004 and 2005,
respectively, the first such incident of terrorism occurred on the Western soil
at the offices of Charlie Hebdo in January 2015, and then the Islamic State
carried out the audacious November 2015 Paris attacks, the March 2016 Brussels
bombings, the June 2016 truck-ramming incident in Nice, and three horrific
terror attacks took place in the United Kingdom within a span of less than
three months in 2017, and after that the Islamic State carried out the
Barcelona attack in August 2017, and then another truck-ramming atrocity
occurred in Lower Manhattan in October 2017 that was also claimed by the
Islamic State.
Keeping this background of the quagmire created by the Obama
administration in Syria and Iraq in mind, it becomes amply clear that the Obama
administration desperately needed Iran’s cooperation in Syria and Iraq to
salvage its botched policy of training and arming jihadists to topple the
government in Syria that backfired and gave birth to the Islamic State that
carried out some of the most audacious terror attacks in Europe from 2015 to
2017.
Thus, Washington signed JCPOA in July 2015 that gave some
concessions to Iran, and in return, the then hardliner Prime Minister of Iraq
Nouri al-Maliki was forced out of power in September 2014 with Iran’s tacit approval
and the moderate former Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi was appointed in his
stead who gave permission to the US Air Force and ground troops to assist the
Iraqi Armed Forces and allied militias to beat back the Islamic State from
Mosul and Anbar.
The Trump administration, however, is not hampered by the
legacy of Obama administration and since the objective of defeating the Islamic
State has already been achieved and Donald Trump gave indications of
withdrawing American troops from Syria as early as April last year, though the
long-awaited decision was finally announced on December 19, therefore
Washington felt safe to annul the Iran nuclear deal in May 2018 and the
crippling “third-party sanctions” have once again been put in place on Iran at
Benjamin Netanyahu’s behest.
Although the European Union is resisting the Trump
administration’s pressure to cancel the Iran nuclear deal for now, the
neocolonial world order is led by the United States; Europe will find no choice
but to toe Washington’s line sooner or later.
No comments:
Post a Comment