Amidst Russia’s impending Ukraine invasion last month while the rest of the world was panicking, there was one man with nerves made of steel who was as stoically calm and nonchalant as a monk meditating amidst an earthquake. Ironically, the Zen monk urging Western policymakers not to exaggerate the Russia invasion threat lest foreign investors and tourists flee the country was none other than the credulous president of Ukraine.
Either President Zelensky was too naïve to understand the
consequences of the imminent invasion or he not only had forewarning but in
fact had a vital role in orchestrating the Russo-Ukraine War during his
three-year presidency in order to accomplish the top-secret mission assigned to
him by his mentors in Western intelligence agencies.
Born to Jewish parents in a town in central Ukraine in Jan.
1978, his early life remains shrouded in mystery. Volodymyr Zelensky was
groomed by covert CIA operatives in Ukraine since his student life while he was
studying law at the Kryvyi Rih National University.
Instead of pursuing legal career, he chose acting as a
profession at the behest of his influential patrons to gain nationwide
publicity, particularly through comedy television series “Servant of the
People” in which Zelensky “prophetically played” the role of the Ukrainian
president.
In fact, his production company Kvartal 95, which produces
films, cartoons and television shows, was generously funded by deep pockets of
Western security agencies. Comically exposing corruption and sleazy dealings of
Ukraine’s politician and oligarch, the series “Servant of the People” aired
from 2015 to 2019 and struck a chord with Ukrainian masses.
Western security agencies not only lavishly funded his
obscure media organization but also introduced him to a clandestine cabal of
illustrious Hollywood producers and directors adept in psychological warfare
and public relationing. The media success of “Servant of the People” is
attributed as much to the efforts of the employees of Kvartal 95 as to the
skill of international media organizations specializing in global
opinion-making.
Riding on the wave of media publicity, Zelensky won a
landslide presidential election in 2019. Later, his political party, which he
“coincidentally” named “Servant of the People,” won an overwhelming victory in
a snap legislative election held shortly after his inauguration as president.
Since 2019, after being elected president through
questionable methods, Zelensky has surreptitiously been working on a
clandestine project to foment a crisis with Russia on a flimsy pretext. Any
other political leader with an iota of rational faculties, even somebody as
rogue as his predecessor Petro Poroshenko, would promptly have agreed to the
Kremlin’s reasonable proposal that Kyiv must give a solemn pledge it won’t join
transatlantic NATO military alliance.
Not only did he scornfully rebuff the Russian proposal but
he also let Ukraine’s security forces stage joint military exercises and naval
drills alongside NATO forces in the Black Sea right under Russia’s nose. His
reckless disregard for the suffering of Ukrainian masses and suicidally
provoking Russia into an armed confrontation aside, he is merely a pawn in the
grand scheme of things.
Although alleged to be a Jew, the real faith of Zelensky and
his associates is Satanism. That’s why he didn’t hesitate in collaborating with
Ukraine’s infamous Azov Battalion, officially part of the National Guard of
Ukraine, that has been widely acknowledged as a neo-Nazi volunteer paramilitary
force connected with foreign white supremacist organizations.
Azov Battalion was initially formed as a volunteer group in
May 2014 out of the ultra-nationalist Patriot of Ukraine gang, and the neo-Nazi
Social National Assembly (SNA) group. As a battalion, the group fought on the
front lines against pro-Russia separatists in Donbas, the eastern region of
Ukraine.
A few months after recapturing the strategic port city of
Mariupol from the Russia-backed separatists, the unit was officially integrated
into the National Guard of Ukraine on November 12, 2014, and exacted high
praise from then-President Petro Poroshenko. “These are our best warriors,” he
said at an awards ceremony in 2014. “Our best volunteers.”
The unit was led by Andriy Biletsky, who served as the leader
of both the Patriot of Ukraine (founded in 2005) and the SNA (founded in 2008). In 2010, Biletsky said Ukraine’s national
purpose was to “lead the white races of the world in a final crusade … against
Semite-led Untermenschen [inferior races].” Biletsky was elected to parliament
in 2014. He left Azov as elected officials cannot be in the military or police
force. He remained an MP until 2019.
These forces were privately funded by oligarchs – the most
known being Igor Kolomoisky, an energy magnate billionaire and then-governor of
the Dnipropetrovska region. In addition to Azov, Kolomoisky funded other
volunteer battalions such as the Dnipro 1 and Dnipro 2, Aidar and Donbas units.
The Mint Press News recently
reported [1]: “Zelensky’s presidential bid in 2019, which saw him win 73%
of the vote, was successful on the basis that he was running in order to combat
corruption and create peace in the country but, as the leaked documents known
as the Pandora Papers revealed, he himself was storing funds in offshore bank
accounts. Zelenskyy’s campaign was at the time boosted and bankrolled by
Israeli-Ukrainian billionaire Igor Kolomoisky – who was himself accused of
stealing $5.5 billion from his own bank.
“Muslims seem to be a major issue for the Azov Battalion.
The Islamophobia present not only in Azov, but also in the National Guard of
Ukraine, came through strongly on social media as the official National Guard
site glorified the Azov Battalion as they dipped their bullets in pig fat. The
video was directed at Muslim soldiers from Chechnya who are fighting on the
side of Russia and were described as orcs by the National Guard on Twitter.”
In June 2015, both Canada and the United States announced
they will not support or train the Azov regiment, citing its neo-Nazi
connections. The following year, however, the US lifted the ban under pressure
from the Pentagon. In October 2019, 40 members of the US Congress led by
Representative Max Rose signed a letter unsuccessfully calling for the US State
Department to designate Azov as a “foreign terrorist organization” (FTO).
In Feb. 2019, The Nation Magazine published a detailed think
piece: “Neo-Nazis
and the Far Right are on the March in Ukraine” [2], elaborating Ukraine’s
far-right militant groups’ xenophobic and white supremacist political ideology.
“Then-Speaker of Parliament Andriy Parubiy cofounded and led
two neo-Nazi organizations: the Social-National Party of Ukraine (later renamed
Svoboda), and Patriot of Ukraine, whose members would eventually form the core
of Azov.
“Even more disturbing is the far right’s penetration of law
enforcement. Shortly after the Maidan coup in 2014, the US equipped and trained
the newly founded National Police, in what was intended to be a hallmark
program buttressing Ukrainian democracy. The deputy minister of the
Interior—which controls the National Police—is Vadim Troyan, a veteran of Azov
and Patriot of Ukraine.
“In 2015, the Ukrainian parliament passed legislation making
two WWII paramilitaries—the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and
the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA)—heroes of Ukraine, and made it a criminal
offense to deny their heroism. The OUN had collaborated with the Nazis and
participated in the Holocaust, while the UPA slaughtered thousands of Jews and
70,000-100,000 Poles on their own volition.”
Notwithstanding, despite “heroically staying” in Kyiv and “valiantly
mounting” the public-relationing offensive on the Western media while the city
is being surrounded by Russian forces, there is no risk to Zelensky’s personal
safety. The Washington
Post reported [3] on March 5:
“The possible Russian takeover of Kyiv has prompted a flurry
of planning at the State Department, Pentagon and other U.S. agencies in the
event that the Zelensky government has to flee the capital or the country
itself. ‘We’re doing contingency planning now for every possibility,’ including
a scenario in which Zelensky establishes a government-in-exile in Poland, said
a U.S. administration official.
“Zelensky, who has called himself Russia’s target No. 1,
remains in Kyiv and has assured his citizens he’s not leaving. He has had
discussions with U.S. officials about whether he should move west to a safer
position in the city of Lviv, closer to the Polish border. Zelensky’s security
detail has plans ready to swiftly relocate him and members of his cabinet, a
senior Ukrainian official said. ‘So far, he has refused to go.’”
It’s obvious from reading between the lines the security
detail of Zelensky not only includes operatives of Ukraine's domestic security
service, the SBU, but also highly skilled special-ops professionals of several
Western security agencies, including the formidable CIA and NSA, who would
whisk him away across the border to Poland as soon as it becomes clear the
capital is about to fall to advancing Russian forces.
In fact, private military contractors in close co-ordination
and consultation with covert operators from CIA and Western intelligence
agencies are not only training Ukraine’s conscript forces in the use of caches
of MANPADS and anti-armor munitions provided by the US, Germany and rest of
European nations as a military assistance to Ukraine but are also directing the
whole defense strategy of Ukraine by taking active part in combat operations in
some of the most hard fought battles against Russia’s security forces north of
Kyiv and at Kharkiv and Donbas.
Famous for hosting CIA’s black sites where alleged al-Qaeda
operatives were water-boarded and tortured before being sent to Guantanamo Bay
in early years of the war on terror, in Poland alone the US military footprint
now exceeds 10,000 troops as the majority of 15,000 troops sent to Europe last
month went to Poland to join the 4,000 US troops already stationed there. The
airfields and training camps in the border regions of Poland have a become a
hub for transporting weapons and militants to Lviv in west Ukraine, which then
travel to battlefields at Kyiv and in east Ukraine.
The Washington Post report further notes: “During an
official visit, a Ukrainian special operations commander told Rep. Michael
Waltz (R-Fla.), Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.) and other lawmakers that they were
shifting training and planning to focus on maintaining an armed opposition,
relying on insurgent-like tactics.
“Ukrainian officials told the lawmakers that they were
frustrated that the United States had not sent Harpoon missiles to target
Russian ships and Stinger missiles to attack Russian aircraft, Moulton and
Waltz said in separate interviews.
“As the Russian military struggles with logistical
challenges — including fuel and food shortages — Waltz anticipates that the
Ukrainians will repeatedly strike Russian supply lines. To do that, they need a
steady supply of weapons and the ability to set improvised explosive devices,
he said. ‘Those supply lines are going to be very, very vulnerable, and that’s
where you really literally starve the Russian army.’
“‘You can’t ship them to Ukraine at the last minute and
expect some national guardsman to pick up a Stinger and shoot down an
aircraft,’ he said. Continuing a resistance campaign will require continued
clandestine shipments of small arms, ammunition, explosives and even
cold-weather gear. ‘Think about the kinds of things that would be used by
saboteurs as opposed to an army repelling a frontal invasion,’ Moulton said.”
Clearly, planning and preparations are well underway to lure
Russia into NATO’s “bear trap project,” a term borrowed from the Soviet-Afghan
War of the eighties when Western powers used Pakistan’s security forces and
generous funding from the oil-rich Gulf States for providing guerrilla warfare
training and lethal weaponry to Afghan jihadists to “bleed the security forces”
of former Soviet Union in the protracted war.
The impending fall of Kyiv in the face of Russian blitz is a
forgone conclusion that even Western policymakers acknowledge that Ukraine’s
conscript military and allied irregular militias are simply not a match for
Russia’s professional security forces in regular warfare.
The tumultuous last three weeks since Russia’s invasion on
Feb. 24 were only the prelude to a long and sordid saga of ensuing war of
attrition mounted by myriad heavily armed militant outfits nurtured by Western powers
against global and regional adversaries, as happened in Afghanistan, Iraq,
Libya and Syria.
Zelensky is being prepared as a “charismatic savior” to lead
a protracted and bloody insurgency against Russian security forces in Ukraine. Although
cutting a dashing figure sporting military fatigues and urging compatriots to
rise up in arms against “Russian invaders” in sentimental addresses while at
the same time pandering to NATO patrons to provide military assistance and
impose harshest sanctions on the Kremlin, what exceptional act of valor has
Volodymyr Zelensky performed thus far? Has he ever been in the line of fire on
the frontlines of the Russo-Ukraine War?
Taking advantage of gullible audience’s innate predilection
for hero worship, the mainstream media is projecting Zelensky as a messiah
waging a crusade against a rival power that dared to stand up to NATO’s further
eastward expansion into Russia’s traditional sphere of influence. The public-relationing
rationale of live-broadcasting his hateful and violent speeches to the
parliaments of Europe and the United States is as much to give publicity to an
expendable stooge as to vilify and internationally isolate an arch-foe on the
global stage.
Citations:
[1] Israel’s
Links to Ukraine’s Thriving Neo-Nazi Movement:
[2] Neo-Nazis
and the Far Right are on the March in Ukraine:
[3] U.S. prepares for a Ukrainian government-in-exile and a long insurgency:
No comments:
Post a Comment