Donald Trump’s abrupt decision to withdraw American troops
from Syria was reportedly made during a telephonic conversation with the
Turkish President Erdogan on December 14, before President Trump made the
momentous announcement in a Tweet on Wednesday, December 19. The decision was
so sudden that even the Turkish president was caught off-guard, according to a
December 22 Associated
Press report [1] by Matthew Lee and Susannah George.
Clearly, an understanding has been reached between
Washington and Ankara. According to the terms of the agreement, the Erdogan
administration released the US pastor Andrew Brunson on October 12, which had
been a longstanding demand of the Trump administration, and has also decided
not to make public the audio recordings of the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, which
could have implicated another American-ally the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin
Salman in the assassination.
And in return, the Trump administration has given a free
hand to Ankara to mount an offensive in the Kurdish-held areas in northern Syria,
though for the time being the Turkish president has delayed the offensive
against the Kurds until the nitty-gritty of the deal is settled in a planned
Trump-Erdogan meeting in Washington in January.
The reason why the Trump administration is bending over
backwards to appease Ankara is that President Erdogan has been drifting away
from Washington’s orbit into the Kremlin’s sphere of influence. Turkey, which
has the second largest army in NATO, has been cooperating with Moscow in Syria
against Washington’s interests since last year and has placed an order for the
Russian-made S-400 missile system, though that deal, too, has been thrown into
jeopardy after Washington’s recent announcement of selling $3.5 billion worth
of Patriot missile systems to Ankara.
Regarding the murder of the Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi at
the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on October 2, more than anything it was the
timing of the assassination and the political mileage that could be gained from
Khashoggi’s murder in the domestic politics of the United States that prompted
the mainstream media to take advantage of the opportunity and mount a smear
campaign against the Trump administration by publicizing the assassination.
Jamal Khashoggi was murdered on October 2, when the US
midterm elections were only a few weeks away. Donald Trump and his son-in-law
Jared Kushner in particular have known to have forged close business relations
with the Saudi royal family. It doesn’t come as a surprise that Donald Trump
chose Saudi Arabia and Israel for his maiden official overseas visit in May
last year.
Thus, the corporate media’s campaign to seek justice for the
murder of Jamal Khashoggi was actually a smear campaign against Donald Trump
and his conservative political base, which is now obvious after the US midterm
election results have been tallied. Even though the Republicans have retained
their 51-seat majority in the Senate, the Democrats now control the House of
Representatives by gaining 39 additional seats.
Clearly, two factors were mainly responsible for the
surprising defeat of the Republicans in the US midterm elections. Firstly, the
Khashoggi murder and the smear campaign unleashed by the neoliberal media,
which Donald Trump often pejoratively mentions as “Fake News” on Twitter,
against the Trump administration.
Secondly, and more importantly, the parcel bombs sent to the
residences of George Soros, a dozen other Democratic Congressmen and The New
York Times New York office by Cesar Sayoc on the eve of the elections. Although
the suspect turned out to be a Trump supporter, he was likely instigated by
shady hands in the US deep state, which is wary of the anti-establishment
rhetoric and pro-Russia tendencies of the so-called “alt-right” administration.
Moreover, on November 29 President Donald Trump abruptly
cancelled a planned G20 meeting in Buenos Aires with the Russian President
Vladimir Putin. Although the ostensible reason for cancelling the meeting cited
in Trump’s tweet was a recent naval standoff in which the Russian forces had
seized three Ukrainian ships, the real reason was a report published in The
Guardian two days before the event on November 27.
In the article titled “Manafort
held secret talks with Assange in Ecuadorian embassy” [2], the author of
the report Luke Harding alleged that Donald Trump’s former campaign manager
Paul Manafort had held secret talks with Julian Assange inside the Ecuadorian
embassy in London in 2013, 2015 and in March 2016, and several months later,
WikiLeaks released a stash of Democratic emails allegedly stolen by Russian
intelligence officers.
Although the report was dubiously sourced and its author
lacks credibility, Paul Manafort had already accepted a plea deal. If he goes a
step further and accepts the charges leveled against him by The Guardian –
which is quite likely since Special Counsel Robert Mueller is already applying
immense pressure on Manafort by alleging that he has violated the terms of his
plea deal by lying – this scandal has the potential of stirring up a political
storm which might eventually culminate in initiation of impeachment proceedings
against Donald Trump for colluding with a foreign government to steal the 2016
US presidential elections.
This is the reason why President Trump was apparently
advised by his close aides to keep maximum distance from the Russian President
Putin until the dust settles down on the Manafort-Assange affair.
Notwithstanding, it would be pertinent to note here that
regarding the Syria policy, there is a schism between the White House and the
American deep state led by the Pentagon. After Donald Trump’s inauguration as
the US president, he had delegated operational-level decisions in conflict
zones such as Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria to the Pentagon.
The Secretary of Defense James Mattis and the former
National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster represented the institutional logic of
the deep state in the Trump administration and were instrumental in advising
Donald Trump to escalate the conflicts in Afghanistan and Syria.
They had advised President Trump to increase the number of
American troops in Afghanistan from 8,400 to 14,000. And in Syria, they were in
favor of the Pentagon’s policy of training and arming 30,000 Kurdish border
guards to patrol Syria’s northern border with Turkey.
Both the decisions spectacularly backfired on the Trump
administration. The decision to train and arm 30,000 Kurdish border guards
infuriated the Erdogan administration to the extent that Turkey mounted
Operation Olive Branch in the Kurdish-held enclave of Afrin in northern Syria
on January 20.
Remember that it was the second military operation by the
Turkish armed forces and their Syrian militant proxies against the Kurdish-held
areas in northern Syria. The first Operation Euphrates Shield in Jarabulus and
Azaz lasted from August 2016 to March 2017.
Nevertheless, after capturing Afrin on March 18, the Turkish
armed forces and their Free Syria Army proxies have now set their sights
further east on Manbij, where the US Special Forces are closely cooperating
with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, in line with the long-held
Turkish military doctrine of denying the Kurds any Syrian territory west of
River Euphrates.
Thus, it doesn’t come as a surprise that President Trump
replaced H.R. McMaster with John Bolton in April; and in a predictable
development on Thursday, James Mattis offered his resignation over President
Trump’s announcement of withdrawal of American troops from Syria, though he
would continue as the Secretary of Defense until the end of February till a
suitable replacement is found.
It bears mentioning that unlike dyed-in-the-wool globalists
and “liberal interventionist” hawks, like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, who
cannot look past beyond the tunnel vision of political establishments, it
appears that the pacifist isolationist Donald Trump not only follows news from
conservative mainstream outlets, like the Fox News, but he has also been
familiar with alternative news perspectives, such as Breitbart’s, no matter how
racist and xenophobic.
Thus, Donald Trump is fully aware that the conflict in Syria
is a proxy war initiated by the Western political establishments and their
regional Middle Eastern allies against the Syrian government. He is also mindful
of the fact that militants were funded, trained and armed in the training camps
located in Turkey’s border regions to the north of Syria and in Jordan’s border
regions to the south of Syria.
Quoting the retired US Brigadier General Anthony Tata on
Thursday, Donald Trump tweeted: “General Anthony Tata, author, ‘Dark Winter.’ ‘I
think the President is making the exact right move in Syria. All the geniuses
who are protesting the withdrawal of troops from Syria are the same geniuses
who cooked the books on ISIS intelligence and gave rise to ISIS.’”
Under the previous Obama administration, the evident policy
in Syria was “regime change.” The Trump administration, however, looks at the
crisis in Syria from an entirely different perspective because Donald Trump
regards Islamic jihadists as a much graver threat to the security of the United
States than Barack Obama.
In order to allay the concerns of Washington’s traditional
allies in the Middle East, Israel in particular, the Trump administration has
conducted a few cruise missile strikes in Syria, but those isolated strikes
were nothing more than a show of force to bring home the point that the newly
elected President Donald Trump is an assertive and powerful president, but
behind the scenes President Trump has been willing to cooperate with the Syrian
government and its backer Russia in order to defeat the Islamic jihadists who
were portrayed as “moderate rebels” by the mainstream media.
Finally, up until now Donald Trump was playing softball with
the Pentagon and the foreign policy bureaucracy, but after the humiliating defeat
in the US midterm elections and clear hand of the deep state and corporate
media in it, Trump has apparently decided to play hardball. This is the reason
why he has announced the withdrawal of 2000 American troops from Syria, and the
decision to scale back American presence in Afghanistan by 7000 troops is
reportedly also in the offing.
No comments:
Post a Comment