Yasser Arafat and George Habash. |
Is it not the international politics’ most significant
coincidence that the Balfour declaration for the creation of Israel was passed
in the same fateful year: November 1917, in which the February and October communist
revolutions were taking place in Russia? Coincidences do happen but sometimes
they are contrived to look like mere coincidences.
No informed person can deny the importance of oil for the
industrial economies, but it is generally believed in the foreign policy
circles that oil took a center stage in the international politics only after
the collective Arab oil embargo of 1973 against the West, when the price of oil
quadrupled in a short span.
It is a fact that the US got so paranoid after the ’73 oil embargo
that it put in place a ban on the export of crude oil outside the US’ borders
(which is still in place) and started keeping 60 days stock of reserve fuel for
strategic and military needs.
Regardless, the view that oil took a center stage in global
politics after the ’73 embargo is a mistaken assumption. Direct and indirect
control over energy resources played a critical role in international politics
since the early 20th century.
The great powers of yore first realized the importance of
oil during the First World War when Germany’s military capabilities were
severely handicapped due to the shortage of fuel for its aircrafts, ships and
mechanized ground forces, like heavy artillery and armored corps.
Notwithstanding, here is a list of few resources and
irrefutable evidence to bring home the point that the critical importance of
the Middle Eastern oil predates the 1917 Balfour declaration for the creation
of Israel:
1) The Anglo-Persian Oil Company was founded in 1908: Volume
production of Persian oil products eventually started in 1913 from a refinery
built at Abadan, Iran, for its first 50 years it was the largest oil refinery
in the world.
2) The Standard Oil of United States was established in
1870: Standard Oil Company and Socony-Vacuum Oil Company became partners in
providing markets for the oil reserves in the Middle East. In 1906, SOCONY
(later Mobil) opened its first fuel terminals in Alexandria.
3) The Burmah Oil was incorporated in 1886: It played a
major role in the oil industry in South Asia for about a century through its
subsidiaries, and in the discovery of oil in the Middle East through its
significant influence over British Petroleum.
4) The Iraq Petroleum Company: The forerunner of the Iraq
Petroleum Company (IPC) was the Turkish Petroleum Company (TPC), which grew out
of the growing belief, in the late 19th century, that Iraq contained
substantial reservoirs of oil.
5) The San Remo Conference: The San Remo Resolution adopted
on 25 April 1920 incorporated the Balfour Declaration of 1917. Under the
Balfour Declaration, the British government undertook to favor the
establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine. Britain received the
mandate for Palestine and Iraq; France gained control of Syria, including present-day
Lebanon.
After taking a cursory look at all of this incontrovertible
proof, it becomes clear that the establishment of a Jewish homeland in
Palestine on religious and historical grounds was merely a pretext for creating
a Western outpost in the energy-rich and Arab-majority Middle East. The
location for the creation of Israel was carefully chosen right next to the geostrategically
critical Suez Canal through which all the maritime traffic between
Mediterranean and Indian Ocean passes every day.
In that fateful year of 1917, the First World War was
nearing its end and the communist revolutions were taking place in Russia. The
rise of communism in Russia was a unique phenomena which threatened the
industrialized nations and their hold over their colonies and the global
political and economic order.
Geographically, the former Soviet Union was adjacent to the
Persian Gulf countries including Saudi Arabia, the Gulf’s principalities, Iraq
and Iran which together hold over 50% of world’s proven oil reserves (800
billion barrels out of world’s total proven crude oil reserves of 1500 billion
barrels.)
In the event of an outbreak of a war between the Western
powers and the Soviet Union , the latter
clearly had an advantage over the Western powers to capture the Middle Eastern
oil resources due to its geographical proximity.
Apart from such a contingency, another factor which must
have played a role in the thinking of Western military strategists is the
appeal of the egalitarian socialist economic system to the masses of the Third
World and especially the Arabs. The fact that some rudimentary socialism
emerged during the Pan-Arab nationalist movements of ‘60s lends credence to
this hypothesis.
In fact, the Western capitalist bloc became so paranoid about
the communist influence in Asia, Africa and Latin America that they actually
nuked Japan after the Second World War due to the fear that it might fall into
the hands of Soviet Union because of the latter’s geographical proximity to
Japan.
Moreover, is it not, once again, a bizarre “coincidence”
that Soviet Union was dissolved in December 1991 and the Maastricht Treaty that
laid the foundations of European Union was signed in February 1992? The basic
purpose of the EU, it would appear, has been nothing more than to lure the
formerly communist states of Eastern and Central Europe into the folds of
Western capitalist bloc by offering incentives and inducements.
No wonder then, President Obama is as freaked out about the
outcome of Brexit as he was during the Ukrainian Crisis in November 2013, when Viktor
Yanukovych suspended preparations for the implementation of an association
agreement with the European Union and tried to take Ukraine back into the fold
of Russian sphere of influence.
Notwithstanding, if we look at the case for the
establishment of Israel, it was predicated on religious and historical
arguments. But both of those arguments don’t hold any water because Zionists
Jews were more secular than religious, as such, and thousands of years old biblical
history is more akin to fairy tales than proper history.
Here we must keep in mind the demographics of Palestine in
the 1920s: there were approximately 50,000 Jews; 50,000 Christians; and more
than 700,000 Arab Muslims in the areas comprising Israel and Palestine of
today. Over the course of next few decades, however, the demographics were
changed by shipping hundreds of thousands of East European Jews to Palestine.
Regardless, let me clarify here that I am not a Holocaust denier,
I do feel sympathy for the European Jews who genuinely were the victims of the
Nazi atrocities. But by what logic or by what norm of justice, Roosevelt and
Churchill pledged to compensate the victims of the Europeans at the cost of a
third party, which had no business in that whole sordid saga? If A commits a
crime against B, B is entitled to get compensation from A, but not from C which
is an unconnected party.
If the imperialists of yore truly felt for the Jews, they
could have accommodated them anywhere in Europe. And if Roosevelt was that
sympathetic to the Jewish cause, he could have settled them anywhere in
Florida, California or Hawaii. But all of these arguments are fait accompli
now, but a fait accompli with horrendous consequences, not for the imperialists
but for the people of the Middle East region, where violence and killings has
become an everyday routine even 68 years after the establishment of Israel.
As I have contended earlier, that the case for Israel was
predicated on two arguments: historical and religious, but neither of those
arguments are anywhere near the truth. International politics is always about inter-state
rivalries and the conflict of national interests. The imperialist powers wanted
to create a Western outpost in the middle of the energy-rich and Muslim
majority Middle East: a settler colony which shares the values and culture of
Western civilization and which is consequently immune from the populist
impulses, especially from the specter of global communism.
With the benefit of hindsight, it appears that the Western
powers didn’t need such a settler colony when they have already acquired
numerous leased military bases all over the Middle East in which 35,000 US
troops are currently stationed to protect its ‘vital strategic interests’ which
is a euphemism for ‘energy interests.’
The value of a land-based colony has been further diminished
with the emergence of the modern navies and the naval-airpower, especially the
aircraft-carriers which are like mobile and floating military bases protecting
the trade and energy interests of the corporate empire in the international
waters, the Persian Gulf and all over the world. But the nuclear-powered
Nimitz-class aircraft-carriers were only a subsequent development (developed in
1975), back in 1917 when the colonial powers conceived the idea of the
market-powered, Zion-class aircraft-carrier: the USS Israel, they had little
idea that it will become more of a liability than an asset.
No comments:
Post a Comment