Sunday, June 22, 2025

How Palestinians were Betrayed by Gulf’s Imperial Stooges


Apart from Zionist and Western regimes, Gulf’s autocrats are equally complicit in the genocide of Palestinian people. Hamas mounted the October 2023 attack to forestall Arab rulers treachery of establishing diplomatic and trade ties with the Zionist regime. UAE, Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco had already recognized illegitimate state of Israel in the run-up to US presidential elections of 2020, and it appeared likely the rest of Gulf Arab States would follow suit, thus burying the dream of independent Palestine.

Iran is the only Islamic military power capable of confronting the Zionist regime and lending moral and material support to Palestinian people, an unforgivable crime for which it is being punished by Israel’s relentless bombing campaign on behalf of Western regimes and Gulf’s autocrats, while the rest of Arab countries ruled by Western proxies are hand in glove with neocolonial powers despite pretending to sympathize with the Palestinian resistance.

The traitors to the Palestine cause are throwing parties in their lavish palaces and cheering Israel’s bombing campaign in Iran, but they don’t appear to have a slightest possible clue regarding the magnitude of danger hovering above their heads. It appears unsavory repeating threats ad nauseam, but if push comes to shove, the unrepresentative tyrants of the Arab World will fall like dominoes. You’ve been warned, time and again. Put a leash on your attack dog, lest it gets rabid, if it isn’t already.

Back in the heyday of Arab nationalism and non-aligned movement, King Faisal of Saudi Arabia imposed an oil embargo against Western patrons of Zionist regime. The 1973 collective Arab oil embargo against the West following the Arab-Israel War lasted only for a short span of six months during which the price of oil quadrupled, but Washington became so paranoid after the embargo that it put in place a ban on the export of crude oil outside the US borders, and began keeping sixty-day stock of reserve fuel for strategic and military needs dubbed the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR).

Furthermore, the Carter Doctrine of 1980 was proclaimed after the embargo, which states: “Let our position be absolutely clear: an attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force.”

For the heinous crime of imposing oil embargo, King Faisal was treacherously assassinated in 1975 by his own greedy brethren. Ever since then, Saudi Arabia and the rest of Gulf States have been ruled by imperial stooges. The new generation of Gulf’s autocrats, including Mohammad bin Salman, bin Zayed and the rest, has struck a Faustian pact with Western regimes.

In this unholy marriage of convenience, Western regimes provide security to Gulf’s authoritarian rulers by establishing military bases across oil-rich Persian Gulf to sustain the tyrannical rule of Gulf’s autocrats, and in return, Arab petro-sheikhs ensure uninterrupted fuel supply to industrial powers and invest trillions of dollars in Western economies.

Donald Trump made an official visit to the Gulf States in mid-May. During the visit, Gulf’s rulers pledged to invest trillions of dollars in the US economy. What did Gulf’s rulers demand in return? Obviously, they asked for providing security. What is the single biggest threat to the illegitimate rule of Gulf’s autocrats? Clearly, it’s Iran’s formidable military capabilities, a stone’s throw away across the Persian Gulf.

A month before Trump’s visit, Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman conveyed a stark warning to Iranian leadership that its time was up. A month after the visit, on Friday the Thirteenth of June, Israel mounted Operation Rising Mouse, targeting Iran’s military and civilian installations. Thus, Israel is in fact doing the “dirty job” of degrading Iran’s military capabilities on behalf of Gulf’s autocrats.

Born into affluence and luxury and raised in opulent palaces, the new generation of Gulf’s princelings and oligarchs regards Palestinian Arabs as an obnoxious liability who want to spoil their cordial relationship with Western and Zionist masters by pushing the agenda of independent Palestinian statehood.

Living a jet-set lifestyle, spending vacations in tourism hubs of Beirut, Istanbul and southern Europe, gambling away millions in casinos of Monte Carlo and Las Vegas, buying luxury yachts and da Vinci’s artwork Salvator Mundi costing half a billion dollar on whim and bestowing largesse upon fawning acolytes across the world, Gulf’s petro-sheikhs look down upon starving Palestinian Arabs mercilessly slaughtered by Zionist mercenaries as buzzkill party poopers imploring them to take up arms against Western benefactors.

Just like privileged Arab ruling elites, the bourgeois liberal classes of the West too don’t give two hoots about suffering of Palestinian people. Although Western mainstream media is attempting to appropriate the Palestine cause by depicting graphic images of Palestinians being massacred in Gaza to sell news and push liberal agenda, the urbanized liberals of the West afflicted with scourge of runaway materialism and compulsive consumerism and busy in their hedonistic lifestyle are indifferent to the suffering of Palestinian Arabs.

Excluding a handful self-styled progressive moral impostors having political aspirations, thus duplicitously appropriating all the noble causes from Palestine and antiwar activism to corporate socialism and environmentalism, the bulk of urbanized liberal classes has scant interest in politics, particularly in foreign affairs.

They would keep on voting for Democrats in the US, Labor in the UK and the rest of establishment liberal parties in Europe and America even if the Obama and Biden admins turns out to be complicit in the genocide not only of Palestinians but Arabs and Muslims across the Middle East.

Duplicitous moral posturing of torchbearers of Western liberalism never ceases to amaze gullible viewers. In the run-up to 2020 presidential elections, Black Lives Matter protests following the killing of George Floyd were politicized to attract black and Hispanic voters and claim moral superiority over American conservatives. Then the burning issue of racial discrimination was swept under the rug during four years of Biden administration.

Afterwards, in the run-up to last November’s presidential elections, pro-Palestine demonstrations, comprising a few dozen singing and dancing hippies, were arranged in the Ivy League Western universities to lure Muslim diaspora. Despite the fact that during Israel’s year-long assault on Gaza, the Biden-led Democratic administration generously provided billions of dollars in military assistance to genocidal Zionists to perpetrate the Gaza Holocaust.

Despite masquerading as pro-Palestine, progressive moral impostors regard Israel as the only liberal democracy in otherwise authoritarian and conservative Arab World. Therefore, my dear progressive brothers and sisters, stop running with the hare and hunting with the hounds and reveal your true identity beneath the mask you are wearing.

It’s noteworthy that the bulk of protesters demonstrating Islamic causes, such as the Palestine cause, in the West is exclusively comprised of Muslim diaspora, with only a sprinkling of white Christians. Hamas is the offshoot of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood, whose gov’t was toppled in July 2013 on instructions of Obama admin as it posed a security threat to Israel, whereas Hezbollah is supported by Iran. In nutshell, only Islamic nationalists, including Islamic Republic of Iran, are sincere with Palestinian liberation movement, the rest is simply moral posturing for political dividends.

Friday, June 20, 2025

Is Trump Sleepwalked into Forever War by Pentagon and Netanyahu


Netanyahu has grossly underestimated Iran’s formidable military capabilities, naively expecting the Islamic Republic to be a walkover like Lebanon and Syria, and has overestimated protection offered by Israel’s fabled Iron Dome air defense system that until now proved effective only against unguided rockets launched by Hamas and Hezbollah against Israel.

Although effective against aircraft and drones, even the best of air defense systems, such as THAAD that Israel has deployed, offer only 70-80% protection against incoming ballistic and cruise missiles. Back in the day, there was even a heated debate among military strategists should costly missile defense systems be even built, because they offer only a false sense of security, and the advent of hypersonic missiles has made them completely worthless.

Despite Netanyahu’s repeated provocations, Iranian leadership has displayed remarkable restraint during the conflict. It has strictly forbidden Iraqi militias, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Houthis in Yemen from jumping into the fray on Iran’s side, at least for now. And despite mobilizing troops towards Iran’s western coast, it has thus far avoided striking Western assets in the Persian Gulf.

This is a turning point in the conflict. Netanyahu will obviously beg Trump to join in airstrikes against Iran in order to get a face-saving. But Trump has to decide whether it’s worth risking an all-out war whose outcome will be massive turmoil in global markets, oil price will skyrocket, stocks will plummet and global economy will witness worst recession since, I don’t know, the great recession of 1930s. Choose peace over war, Mr. President, lest you too go down in history like the rest of warmongers, including Bush, Obama and Biden.

As I predicted in February that after sacking Gen. CQ Brown as Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff and appointing a partisan political appointee retired air force Lt. Gen. Dan Caine in his stead, the institutional policy of US military would now be collectively determined by chiefs of staff and combatant commanders.

After ingratiating American Step-President Donald Trump by deploying National Guard and Marines in LA to crack down on anti-ICE protesters, the Politico reported on Thursday that Iran hawk CENTCOM’s chief Gen. Erik the Gorilla is calling the shots in Iran-Israel conflict, requesting deployment of additional aircraft carriers and fighter aircraft in the Middle East, while Def Sec Hegseth and Chairman Caine are simply playing the role of liaison officers between the White House and the military brass.

It appears the toddler-in-chief lacks the capacity to learn from past mistakes. Trump should recall how Jim Mattis, McMaster and Mark Milley stabbed him in the back during the first term by overruling his non-interventionist agenda and fueling conflicts in the Middle East, leading to electoral defeat in 2020 presidential elections.

Since the Cold War, the Pentagon’s top brass has developed an uncanny expertise in brinkmanship. For the initial few months of the Ukraine War, the Pentagon’s declared policy was that US would only provide defensive weapons to Ukrainian proxies, then the policy was revised to include short-range offensive weapons so that trigger-happy Ukrainian troops don’t strike deep inside Russia, but eventually the Pentagon provided everything short of nukes in its arsenal to Ukrainian proxies, including HIMARS, ATACMS, tanks and even F-16 aircraft.

It even floated the idea of providing JASSM missiles with an extended range of up to thousand kilometers to Ukraine, but as Ukrainian pilots weren’t skilled in operating F-16 and couple of aircraft crashed in Ukraine, therefore the idea was dropped. Besides, Storm Shadows provided by Britain didn’t prove game changer in the conflict.

Now, the same cat-and-mouse game is being played with Iran. First, it was decided to let Israel bomb Iran for a week to bring it to negotiating table. After Iranian leadership agreed to resume negotiations, then it’s been decided to let the standoff continue for a while to see what happens. In the meantime, if a compulsive arsonist lights up a matchstick in the powderkeg and the critical oil infrastructure of the Persian Gulf goes up in flames, then they’d say, oops, we made a mistake, let’s punish Iran for fomenting the worst energy crisis of the industrial era.

Before Trump, former President Obama also claimed to be a peacemaker. He even managed to withdraw US forces from Iraq in 2011, but only to redeploy them after ISIS overran Syria and western Iraq in 2014. Obama also made the fatal mistake of listening to his generals and fawning Netanyahu’s persistent groveling and ended up simultaneously bombing seven countries in the Middle East.

Netanyahu has become the longest-serving prime minister of Israel, consistently being elected since 2009, as he embodies the deep state logic. Obama initiated a proxy war in Syria on Netanyahu’s behalf in order to eliminate a security threat posed to Israel’s northern borders from Hezbollah, backed by Iran and Baathist gov’t of Bashar al-Assad, fomenting the worst humanitarian crisis of the Middle East in the decade-long proxy war, causing hundreds of thousands of fatalities, displacing over half of Syria’s 25 million population and reducing the whole country down to rubble.

Moreover, the decade-long conflict in Syria gave birth to myriads of militant groups, including the Islamic State, and after the conflict spilled across the border into neighboring Iraq in early 2014, it was directly responsible for the spate of Islamic State-inspired terror attacks in Western countries from 2015 to 2017.

Since the beginning of the Syrian conflict in August 2011 to June 2014, when the Islamic State overran Mosul and Anbar in Iraq, an informal pact existed between the Obama admin, its regional allies and jihadists of the Middle East against the Iranian resistance axis comprising Iraq, Syria and their Lebanon-based proxy Hezbollah that posed a security threat to Israel’s northern borders. Therefore, in accordance with the pact, militants were trained and armed in the training camps located in the border regions of Turkey and Jordan to battle the Assad government.

This arrangement of an informal pact between the Obama admin and the jihadists of the Middle East against the Iran-allied forces worked well up to August 2014, when the Obama admin made a volte-face on its previous regime change policy in Syria and began conducting airstrikes against one group of militants battling the Assad government, the Islamic State, after the latter overstepped its mandate in Syria and overran Mosul and Anbar in Iraq from where the US had withdrawn its troops only a couple of years ago in December 2011.

After this reversal of policy in Syria by the Obama admin and the subsequent Russian military intervention on the side of the Syrian government in September 2015, the momentum of jihadists expansion in Syria and Iraq stalled, and they felt that their Western patrons had committed a treachery against the jihadist cause, hence they were infuriated and rose up in arms to exact revenge for this betrayal.

If we look at the chain of events, the timing of the spate of terror attacks against the West was critical: the Islamic State overran Mosul in June 2014, the Obama admin began conducting airstrikes against the Islamic State’s targets in Iraq and Syria in August 2014, and after a lull of almost a decade since the horrific Madrid and London bombings in 2004 and 2005, respectively, the first such incident of terrorism occurred on the Western soil at the offices of Charlie Hebdo in January 2015.

Then the Islamic State carried out the audacious November 2015 Paris attacks, the March 2016 Brussels bombings, the June 2016 truck-ramming incident in Nice, and three horrific terror attacks took place in the United Kingdom within a span of less than three months in 2017, and after that the Islamic State carried out the Barcelona terrorist attack in August 2017.

20 June 2025.

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Is Israel Bombing Iran on Behalf of Gulf’s Autocrats


If circumstances get really desperate, Iran has couple of aces up its sleeve that it could play as last resort to make industrial powers feel the pain as Iran burns and Neros at G7 summit fiddle. Iran’s invaluable asset is its geo-strategic location, spanning the entire eastern coast of oil-rich Persian Gulf.

Firstly, as Iran’s astute military leadership has already indicated, Iran could enforce a temporary blockade of Strait of Hormuz from where over half of world’s oil exports pass for the duration of the conflict. This would instantly make oil prices jump over $100 a barrel and Shylocks of Western World would immediately feel the pinch.

As far as American saber-rattling is concerned, Mr. Trump should know that Iran is known to possess plenty of Russian anti-ship Onik cruise missiles, whose export version is called Brahmos in India and Amir al-Bahr, Lord of the Seas, in Perso-Arabic.

Iran has passed on several tranches of these ship-killer hypersonic missiles to Yemen’s Houthis as well, on the condition that they won’t deploy the missiles until after getting greenlight from Iran. Therefore, it would be prudent of US Navy to steer clear of Iranian and Yemeni coasts, lest its ships are sunk to the bottom of Indian Ocean.

Secondly, Iran could go for the “nuclear option,” not literally but metaphorically. May God bless Haj Qassem Soleimani with highest ranks in paradise who proved to the world that the real super power of the Middle East is none other than mighty Iran. He orchestrated the audacious attack on the Abqaiq petroleum installation and the Khurais oil field in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia in September 2019, which was the first major attack in the Persian Gulf against the assets of Washington and its regional allies that hampered Saudi oil production for months.

The “sacrilegious assault” on the veritable Mecca of the oil production industry was an apocalypse for the global oil industry, because the Persian Gulf holds 800 billion barrels, over half of world’s total 1,500 billion barrels crude oil reserves.

It bears mentioning that alongside deploying several thousand American troops, additional aircraft squadrons and Patriot missile batteries in Saudi Arabia in the aftermath of the Abqaiq attack, several interventionist hawks in Washington invoked the Carter Doctrine of 1980 as a ground for mounting retaliatory strikes against Iran, which states:

“Let our position be absolutely clear: an attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force.”

Mr. Trump is an accomplished businessman, always eager to promote trade and investment, who has been duped by blood-thirsty Netanyahu fighting for his political survival. Iran is known to hold second largest oil and gas reserves in the Persian Gulf after Saudi Arabia, and its leadership has already indicated that Iran is willing to negotiate a nuclear deal. It’s a golden opportunity to make most of it. Don’t push Iran over the brink, because with the back against the wall, Iran will retaliate with all possible means at its disposal.

Mr. Trump used to be a pacifist president during the first term, and I diligently campaigned for him in both elections. But something has changed in his second term; he’s not the same antiwar politician. It seems the impeachment proceedings in the run-up to 2020 presidential elections, electoral defeat at the hands of Biden, January 2021 Capitol riots and subsequent insulting court appearances have affronted his ego and damaged him psychologically, and he is out there to get revenge.

Rumors abound that his Zionist son-in-law Jared Kushner has threatened to divorce Ivanka if Trump doesn’t unconditionally endorse Netanyahu’s vindictive policy of setting Middle East ablaze. While I empathize with Trump’s dilemma, personal affairs should be kept separate from politics. Mr. Trump couldn’t let blood-thirsty lunatic have his way simply to save the marriage of his beloved daughter.

Israel’s key rationale in bombing Iran isn’t to destroy its nuclear program, because Iranian leadership has already indicated that Iran is willing to negotiate a nuclear deal, placing curbs on its nuclear program. The Zionist regime’s central objective is to degrade Iran’s conventional warfare capabilities, specifically its drone and missile program, as Israel did in Lebanon and Syria.

While I concede replenishing Iran’s long-range missile arsenal might take some time after the bombing campaign, it won’t make Iran toothless. As I previously stated, Iran’s invaluable asset is its geo-strategic location, spanning the entire eastern coast of oil-rich Persian Gulf. The entire oil infrastructure of littoral states of Persian Gulf is only a stone’s throw away from Iran’s western coast.

Iran doesn’t need long-range missiles to mount audacious attacks on US military bases and oil infrastructure in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait and Qatar, because simply rocket artillery would suffice to cripple global oil production for months to come. Not a drop of oil will flow outside Persian Gulf. Meanwhile, the industrial world could adjust to renewables.

Gulf’s autocrats are co-belligerents in Iran-Israel conflict. Israel has mounted a bombing campaign to degrade Iran’s conventional warfare capabilities on the behalf of Gulf’s insecure rulers. Lebanon-based Hezbollah and Baathist Assad gov’t in Syria posed a proximate threat to Israel’s regional security, both of which have already been eliminated. Iran is over 1500 km away from Israel. It takes a veritable ICBM to strike military targets in Israel.

Donald Trump made an official visit to the Gulf States in mid-May. During the visit, Gulf’s rulers pledged to invest trillions of dollars in the US economy. What did Gulf’s rulers demand in return? Obviously, they asked for providing security. What is the single biggest threat to the illegitimate rule of Gulf’s autocrats? Clearly, it’s Iran’s formidable military capabilities, a stone’s throw away across the Persian Gulf.

A month before Trump’s visit, Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman conveyed a stark warning to Iranian leadership that its time was up. A month after the visit, on Friday the 13th of June, Israel mounted Operation Rising Mouse, targeting Iran’s military and civilian installations.

The Bedouin chieftains claiming royal descent from camel herders should know that if Iran goes down, the critical oil infrastructure in Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait and Qatar too will go up in flames. The tyrannical regimes will be toppled and replaced with genuinely representative governments of Muslim Brotherhood.

The butcher Clown Prince of Yehudi Arabia, fond of cutting down critics like Jamal Khashoggi into pieces; the son of most notorious womanizer of the era, the Emir of Abu Dhabi, pretending to be the standard-bearer of Bedouin liberalism while fueling conflicts and providing military support to Southern Separatists in Yemen, Khalifa Haftar in Libya and RSF militia in Sudan; the duplicitous Emir of Qatar, masquerading as Brotherhood patron while hosting the largest US airbase at al-Udeid, they must all pray to God the conflict ends quickly and intercede on Iran’s behalf to end the bombing campaign.

Otherwise, Iranian Fidayeen, equipped with rocket artillery and missiles, have been positioned along Iran’s entire western coast, awaiting orders from Ayatollah Khamenei to unleash barrages of drones and missiles across the Persian Gulf targeting global oil production industry selling oil as well as blood of Muslims to Shylocks of Western regimes.

The servile lackey of security establishment, the Western mainstream media, which for once has buried the hatchet and seems to have developed sudden fondness for American step-president and is depicting Trump as Christian savior for letting Israel bomb residential areas and shopping malls in Iran, is naively claiming the “inner circle” of Ayatollah Khamenei has been eliminated. There is no such thing as inner and outer circle in the Shiite Imamate. The whole of Iran is Khamenei’s inner circle, standing firmly behind Imam of the era.

Yesterday, Trump credulously boasted that Israeli and US air forces have achieved air supremacy over Iran’s airspace. Air supremacy is typically a precursor to mounting ground invasion, as in Qaddafi’s Libya in 2011. But who will dare to invade Iran, a handful Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MeK) terrorists, who are only good for mounting subversive ops in Iran on Mossad’s behalf?

US Air Force should steer clear of Iranian skies and use Jordanian or Iraqi airspace instead, if it wants to save the precious F-35 stealth aircraft. Iran doesn’t need S-300 batteries to shoot down hostile aircraft. It has bought a huge chunk of MANPADS that Pentagon provided to Ukrainian proxies and which ended up in East European arms black market. Now the IRGC has trained and equipped entire battalions skilled in using MANPADS. God, I wish divine providence had bestowed a bit of brains to Yankees instead of destructive weapons.

Monday, June 16, 2025

How CIA and Mossad Infiltrated Palestinian Resistance to Sabotage it


Self-centric Western World is a weird place where cringe-worthy sociopaths are elected rulers, fawning acolytes run powerful media organizations, scrupulously hiding gruesome atrocities of their masters, and conscientious critics are dispatched to nuthouses. Standing over heaps of human skulls, even Attila the Hun would have an iota of shame and won’t boast the way Netanyahu hysterically brags while standing over dead bodies of well over hundred thousand Palestinians.

Himself realizing the unmistakable irony in his Orwellian doublespeak, he sheepishly addresses the “civilized world,” inanely pontificating that over 400 million Arabs and 85 million Iranians should be denied the right to self-defense, or preferably massacred at the altar of Judaism, in order to safeguard “security interests” of seven million Jews in illegitimate state of Israel.

Israel was created amidst oil-rich Arab World during World War II lest Baathist Arab socialist states might fall under the Soviet sphere of influence in the backdrop of the Cold War. Therefore, like the infamous McCarthyite agitprop of the sixties engendering Russophobia amongst gullible Western masses, the naïve sheeple were also inoculated against perils of anti-Semitism to the extent where it became practically impossible to denounce even Zionist hegemony in the Arab World. This puerile reverse prejudice still persists in the contemporary world and anti-Zionist voices are promptly silenced and pro-Palestine activists are ostracized from mainstream discourse.

No pun intended but Netanyahu seems to be a military genius who appears to have devised a cunning tactic of curtailing Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities by letting Iran launch most long-range missiles in its arsenal at Israel, thus depleting its missile stockpiles. Israelites should thank Jehovah that Iran doesn’t have nuclear warheads to mount on missiles, otherwise Bibi’s astute gambit might have backfired.

Although he had served as a petty sergeant in special forces for a few years, Netanyahu doesn’t have a military mind. He has gravely underestimated Iran’s military capabilities. He was expecting Iran to be a walkover like Lebanon and Syria that won’t be able to mount retaliatory missile strikes at Israel after Israel’s first onslaught, deploying 200 aircraft equipped with American JASSM and Franco-British Storm Shadow / SCALP cruise missiles, albeit with Hebrew nomenclature, costing American and European taxpayers billions of dollars.

But over the years, Iran has emerged as a major regional military power to reckon with. Not only is Islamic Republic’s defense production industry self-reliant in missile and drone technology but it has also reportedly provided stockpiles of drones and missiles to Russia during the Ukraine War. To return the favor in the hour of need, tranches of hypersonic missiles are en route from Russia to Iran, including formidable Oreshnik missile equipped with six MIRV warheads. The missile is otherwise ready to be deployed but it will be battle tested on Tel Aviv and Haifa.

Throughout the conflict, Iran has adopted a pacifist stance. Even now, it was ready to negotiate a nuclear deal. But Israeli and American policymakers duplicitously used negotiations as a red herring to mount surprise airstrikes on Iran. The reason two of Iran’s top generals and six nuclear scientists were assassinated in the initial strike on June 13 was that they were caught by surprise, as they were asleep at their homes, not realizing Zionists, since ancient times, deploy cloak and dagger tactics to treacherously assassinate adversaries.

Israel was conceived in the 1940s on the whim of the founder of the US deep state – Gen. George C. Marshall. During World War II, the Allied and Axis powers used oil as a weapon by enforcing naval blockades of ships carrying fuel, thus crippling military capabilities of adversaries.

Realizing the critical significance of abundant oil reserves of the Persian Gulf, Israel was created amidst the Arab World as military outpost of Imperial United States and its armed forces were trained, organized and equipped with sophisticated American weapons as Zionist Corps of the US CENTCOM.

After decline of Anglo-French Empire following World War II, Imperial United States emerged as its successor. After the Arab World gained independence in 1950s, Baathist Arab socialist political forces formed governments in several Arab states. This fact engendered apprehensions in Western capitals that the oil-rich Arab World might fall under the Soviet sphere of influence.

Therefore, the CIA and Israeli Mossad, operating hand in glove, infiltrated Palestinian liberation movement with spies, double agents and criminal elements, such as German neo-Nazis and Latin American narcotics smugglers. These infiltrators mounted false flag black-ops, including Black September hijackings and the Munich Olympics massacre of 1972, in order to vilify Palestinian resistance and legitimize the creation of Zionist regime.

Netanyahu was one such operative on the payroll of deep state. In May 1972, a Belgian Sabena Airline flight from Brussels to Tel Aviv was hijacked by four hippies, two men and two women, addicted to opium and heroin and claiming to belong to Black September Organization – a coproduction of CIA and Mossad to discredit legit Palestinian liberation movement.

The drug junkies pretending to be hijackers had two handguns, which they apparently discovered hidden behind flush tank of aircraft’s toilet like the plot of Hollywood epic Godfather. But the useful idiots didn’t realize they were given blank ammo that only makes noise without firing a shot.

A team of Israeli commandos, led by Ehud Barak and including Netanyahu, was promptly dispatched to neutralize wannabe terrorists. Disguised as aircraft technicians, commandos raided the aircraft, killing two male hijackers and capturing two female concubines while rescuing the hostages.

During the one-sided firefight, as hijackers were shooting blank ammo, Netanyahu was shot in the arm by one of his colleagues. After the blockbuster thriller was screened in cinema houses in Israel and across Western World, Barak and Netanyahu were hailed as national icons and both were subsequently elected premiers.

Although this satire is getting rather lengthy for the fast age of digital era, I’m gonna recount just one more tragicomic episode and let readers figure out rest of hijackings of sixties and seventies typically attributed to Palestinian liberation movement themselves.

In July 1976, an Air France flight between Tel Aviv and Paris was similarly hijacked by four hijackers, two of whom claimed to belong to Palestinian resistance while the remaining two were German neo-Nazis, and was forced to land at Uganda’s Entebbe airport.

It might seem a coincidence to gullible sheeple that Uganda’s military dictator Idi Amin initially enjoyed considerable support from Israel and Western regimes, though he later fell out of favor. Hearing the news of hijacking in the morning bulletin, disgraced Nixon’s successor Gerald Ford immediately picked up phone and called Idi Amin.

Ford offered Amin millions of dollars and American support for letting Israeli commandos mount false flag raid at Entebbe airport. Amin was initially hesitant due to fear of negative publicity but he eventually agreed after Ford promised that Jane Fonda would spend vacations with him.

Afterwards, a team of hundred Israeli commandos was hastily assembled. It was trained by American special ops gurus, including Francis Ford Coppola, Martin Scorsese and Steven Spielberg. The commandos raided the Entebbe airport, killing hijackers and rescuing hostages. But during the raid, Benjamin Netanyahu’s older brother Lt. Col. Yonatan Netanyahu was also killed. Netanyahu family claims he was shot, though rumors abound he suffered a heart attack due to excitement of the epic mission.

It’s noteworthy that in almost all of these hijackings of sixties and seventies naively attributed to Palestinian liberation movement, plots were quite similar: hippies addicted to narcotics posing as freedom fighters, accomplices included German neo-Nazis and Latin American drug smugglers, such as Carlos the Jackal, after making international news headlines, purported hijackers were easily overpowered in commando raids and were immediately killed lest they spill secrets, and hostages were effortlessly rescued with minimum collateral damage.

Excluding the Munich Olympics massacre in 1972, in which a dozen victims lost their lives. But that was a botched operation as German police officials weren’t privy to the plot. CIA and Mossad assumed that the terrorists and hostages would be granted safe passage, and indeed a Boeing 727 was waiting on the tarmac to fly them out of Germany. But foolhardy German police deployed snipers at the airport, attempting to shoot hijackers and rescue hostages. This led to the carnage in which precious lives were lost, for which I sincerely apologize on behalf of CIA and Mossad. Typically, their subversive operations, vilifying Palestinian resistance across the world, were quite flawless and surgical, but occasional mishaps do happen. After all, spies too are human, no matter how soulless.

Wednesday, June 4, 2025

How Deep State Assassinated Modi’s Protégé Gen. Bipin Rawat?


How ironic that only two generals in Indian army were promoted out of turn as army chiefs and both were brutally assassinated. One was Gen. Arun Kumar Vaidya who was appointed army chief by Indira Gandhi in 1983 and the other was Bipin Rawat who was appointed army chief by Modi in 2016 while superseding two senior officers.

Following the gruesome assassination of Indira Gandhi in 1984, her handpicked army chief Gen. Arun Kumar Vaidya also met his predestined fate in 1986, only several months after retirement. Both assassinations were alleged to be carried out by Sikhs, but in fact the murder plots had fingerprints of deep state all over, in the backdrop of Siachen conflict and Indian army’s subversive plan to mount pre-emptive airstrikes on Pakistan’s nuclear installations in the Orwellian year 1984, as brought to light by the US State Dept.’s documents declassified in 2015.

Bipin Rawat was Modi’s lackey. Despite completing three-year tenure as army chief, the new position of Chief of Defense Staff was created in Jan. 2020 to accommodate him, because Modi wouldn’t trust anybody to lead India’s behemoth armed forces besides him. Modi had trouble finding Rawat’s replacement, and eventually Ajit Doval’s protégé Anil Chauhan was brought back from retirement to be appointed as Chief of Defense Staff, which is a ceremonial post equivalent to Pakistan’s Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff. Indian army’s de facto head honcho has traditionally been army chief, a powerful appointment currently held by Gen. Upendra Dwivedi.

Bipin Rawat was despised by India’s military brass, because despite suffering two humiliating defeats – India’s airstrikes on Pakistan following Pulwama attack in Feb. 2019 when an Indian aircraft was shot down by PAF and pilot held captive and the Galwan incident in disputed Kashmir in May 2020 in which Chinese troops beat to death scores of Indian soldiers – still Rawat was continuing to lead India’s army and there was no way to get rid of him because he had Modi’s blessings.

One fine morning in Dec. 2021, Rawat’s Mi-17 helicopter took off but never landed, because a bomb aboard the chopper exploded, killing all 14 people onboard, including Rawat and his wife. Being an avid investigator gifted with preternatural powers, I can tell the name of the murderer by looking into his eyes.

Despite being a Marathi Brahmin practicing Gandhi’s ahimsa and renouncing meat, Gen. Manoj Naravane has the penetrating eyes of a medieval assassin. Not to mention he was army chief at the time of Rawat’s sad demise, oversaw counter-insurgency ops and was familiar with assassination techniques. Anil Chauhan should also be careful while boarding aircraft, because India’s notorious aircraft have a history of “technical malfunctions” and “pilot errors” leading to fatal crashes.

Notwithstanding, last November, US prosecutors belonging to world’s most sleazy and financially corrupt plutocracy accused Indian tycoon Gautam Adani of orchestrating a $250m bribery scheme. They alleged Mr. Adani paid bribes to Indian officials to secure green-energy contracts in India worth $2bn in profits over 20 years. In the following weeks, the Adani business empire lost over $30 billion in market shares, comprising one-third of its net worth.

There were several caveats in the indictment, however. Firstly, do courts in Yankeeland exercise ICJ’s jurisdiction over entire globe? Because the alleged crime was committed by an Indian businessman, involving purported bribes paid to Indian officials employed by state-owned company of Indian gov’t.

Although exorbitant amount of “$250 trillion” was supposedly raised in the US, how did clairvoyants reading fortune cookies come to the asinine conclusion the money was being raised for paying bribes? Maybe the Indian billionaire wanted to buy a luxury yacht or an emerald-studded necklace for his wife with a couple of hundred million bucks, as Mr. Adani is renowned for his philanthropic activities of generously feeding and clothing fame-hungry and scantily clad celebs of Bollywood film industry.

Secondly, what sort of an imbecile, devoid of any sense of business, would pay $250 million in bribes merely for $100 million in profits per year? Moreover, if Mr. Adani is the largest contributor to Mr. Modi’s political party, having many federal and state ministers if not the entire Modi gov’t in his deep pockets, as claimed by Indian media, then why couldn’t he simply use the political influence to get state contracts instead of paying hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes?

In fact, there was much more to the politically motivated indictment of the substantial contributor to India’s GDP than meets the eye. In August 2022, a Qatari court handed down death sentences to eight Indian former naval officers for spying for Israel, who have since been released. Then in Sept. 2023, Canada’s former PM Trudeau, fighting for his political survival in domestic politics, publicly accused Modi gov’t for orchestrating the brazen assassination of Sikh separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar.

Unsurprisingly, the Biden admin followed suit and accused Indian foreign intelligence service RAW of plotting to kill another Sikh separatist leader in the US. Since then, the tussle between India and Canada has exacerbated and both countries have expelled scores of diplomats. Ideally, the Biden admin could have imposed economic sanctions on India in order to deter it from conducting black-ops on the US and Canadian soil. But it didn’t want to spoil relations with an important ally against China.

Therefore, the US has resorted to subtle tactics of arm-twisting the Modi gov’t that if it doesn’t desist from mounting subversive intelligence operations in the US and Canada, then the USG could cause irreparable damage to lucrative Indian businesses operating in the US.

Let’s hope the nuanced message has been conveyed to Mr. Modi. Otherwise, as a neocolonial power monopolizing international financial system since the Bretton Woods Accord of 1945, the US has countless lethal weapons in its formidable arsenal for conducting trade and economic warfare and coercing developing economies to toe the line.

Finally, despite trailing to Canada’s conservatives for months, Trudeau’s successor Mark Carney won elections held in March and formed minority gov’t after an alleged lunatic plowed to death 11 people at Filipino festival in Vancouver a day before elections who was initially portrayed as white supremacist.

Wearing corporate media’s glasses, however, investigative reporters didn’t notice any correlation between the massacre and Carney’s triumph who is resolutely standing up to Trumpist America, neither did anybody bother to notice deep state conspiracy disqualifying Marine Le Pen in France. We have full faith in Western political and judicial systems, and hopefully the culprit will be dealt according to law, but is a cold-blooded murderer qualified to be elected premier?

Tuesday, May 27, 2025

India’s Saber-rattling could Trigger Nuclear War with Pakistan


During Pakistan’s recent standoff with India, following the Pahalgam terrorist attack on April 22 in disputed Kashmir in which 26 Indian tourists were killed by gunmen that India blamed on Pakistan, India flaunted its newly acquired military capabilities, including Brahmos missiles, S-400 air defense system, Rafale fighter jets and aircraft carriers.

On the night between May 6 and 7, India mounted airstrikes on Pakistan’s border towns, claiming to have destroyed terrorist infrastructure, dubbed Operation Sindoor by the hardline Modi government. In defensive maneuvers, Pakistan claims to have destroyed an S-400 battery at Adampur with a hypersonic missile and also claims to have shot down six Indian fighter aircraft, including three Rafale fighters with Chinese J-10 aircraft, while shooting down of at least one Rafale jet has been confirmed by independent sources.

Regarding Indian Navy’s hoax aircraft carriers, it’s noteworthy that currently only the US Navy has a dozen odd Nimitz class aircraft carriers, using which it dominates international waters. Besides US, France has built only one nuclear-powered aircraft carrier named Charles de Gaulle.

Indian Navy’s conventionally powered aircraft carriers aren’t real aircraft carriers because they are powered by General Electric’s gas turbines. While using its two aircraft carriers, Indian navy might project its naval power in adjacent areas of Indian Ocean, these white elephants can’t venture into international waters due to fuel weight and cost. Thus, the very purpose of building an aircraft carrier is defeated.

Historically, India acquired an aircraft carrier from Russia in 2004, which was originally named Baku and then Admiral Gorshkov. It was decommissioned by Russian Navy in 1996 and was rebuilt by India with the help of Russian technicians in order to use it as psychological warfare tactic for flaunting naval power in the region.

Indian Navy’s second aircraft carrier Vikrant is a cheap imitation of Russian ship. While it is capable of carrying missiles and helicopters, it is doubtful whether fixed-wing aircraft could take off and land on its flight deck, especially antiquated Russian MiG fighters are likely to meet frequent accidents during takeoff and landing.

US Navy uses purpose-built F/A-18 Hornets on Nimitz class aircraft carriers, which are lighter and require shorter run-up. Although Indian Navy could use Rafale fighters, they are quite costly and it’s doubtful India’s developing economy could sustain the burden of losing a few more, either in naval accidents or after being shot down by adversaries.

Since the standoff on May 7 and then tit for tat airstrikes on May 10, India’s military strategists are whining that India is fighting Chinese military technology in its battles with arch-rival Pakistan. By the same logic, however, Pakistan could make a counter-claim that Pakistan is fighting Russian military technology in battles with India. Because excluding overpriced French champagne, Rafale aircraft, that India should better keep under lock and key lest it squanders the holy grail, the rest of Indian military technology is actually Russian built.

The much-hyped Brahmos missiles are in fact Russian Oniks that are fundamentally anti-ship missiles, as their only specialty is that they are known as sea-skimming missiles that could attain altitude as low as 10 meters, thus making their stealth feature deadly against ships. But desperate Indians are using Brahmos/Oniks as air-launched missiles. As Oniks could only be carried by strategic bombers due to their weight, the Indian Air Force recently dispatched squadrons of Su-30 aircraft back to Russia to be modified for carrying just one Brahmos missile.

Among the six Indian aircraft Pakistan claims to have shot down on May 7, at least one was such a modified Su-30 carrying a Brahmos missile. Quite surprisingly, it wasn’t hit by a Pakistani missile, instead rumor has it that the Su-30 crashed while attempting to launch a Brahmos and the missile malfunctioned.

Although hailed as the ultimate Hindu battle avatar that could turn the tide in war by Indian military strategists, Russia never even once deployed Oniks in the three-year-long Ukraine War, an incontrovertible fact that speaks volumes about preference Russia attaches to the missile. Mach 3 is a pretty ordinary speed in avant garde military technology. Russia typically relies on Iskander M ballistic missiles, and Kalibr and Kinzhal hypersonic missiles while mounting airstrikes on Ukraine.

Apart from being equipped with Storm Shadow / SCALP missiles that are basically European variants of American JASSM cruise missiles carried by F-16 aircraft, Rafale is the crappiest aircraft ever built by aviation industry. No wonder three of these overrated aircraft were shot down by PAF in the May 7 standoff.

It’s noteworthy that there’s no such aircraft category as 4.5 generation. Either you have a 4th gen. aircraft, such as F-16, or a 5th gen. stealth aircraft, such as F-35. Rafale is simply an upgraded 4th gen. aircraft. Any prudent aviation expert would’ve advised sleazy Indian politicians to invest in 5th gen. stealth aircraft, instead of squandering billions of dollars on 4th gen. fighter jets that they would regret in the long run.

Apparently, crafty Frenchmen invented the 4.5 gen. aircraft as a marketing gimmick to dupe naïve Indians into buying outmoded aircraft. Rumors abound that Indian and French defense officials have received millions of dollars in illicit financial kickbacks in the Ponzi scheme of the century.

After thoroughly examining the debris of missiles, Pakistan’s military experts have conclusively determined the missiles that struck our airbases in May 7 and 10 airstrikes were Storm Shadows / SCALP launched from Rafale aircraft, not crudely built Brahmos that misses the intended target by several kilometers and often drops the payload midway during the course of flight.

Therefore, France must immediately stop further deliveries of SCALP missiles to India if it wishes to avert a nuclear holocaust in the tinderbox of South Asia. I humbly implore His Royal Highness President Donald J. Trump to ensure, as pacifist leader of the free world, that the cocaine-junkie president of France, who recently got slapped by his wife for snorting coke and forgetting to clean the nose and who used his political influence to disqualify the real representative of French electorate Marine Le Pen, must abide by the Missile Technology Control Regime and desist from providing weapons of mass destruction to rogue regimes, such as Modi’s India.

From Hitler down to Modi, nobody wanted all-out war. The fascists were simply intoxicated by their newly amassed military power and they underrated the strength of adversaries, thus resorting to brinkmanship that eventually culminated in catastrophic wars causing insufferable losses to mankind.

Thursday, January 2, 2025

Will Poland Refurbish Israeli Patriots for Ukraine War?


In June, rumors swirled in the media that the Biden administration was holding discussions with Israel and Ukraine about the possibility of transferring aging Patriot air defense systems currently in Israel to Ukraine. The CNN reported: “The systems would likely need to be transferred to the US first, where they would undergo refurbishment, before being sent to Ukraine.”

In April, the Israel Defense Forces said it would soon “retire its Patriot systems,” as noted by The Financial Times, though the report elided over providing a valid reason for scraping the much-touted air defense system. Since then, a gag order appears to have been issued on reporting about military co-operation between Israel and Ukraine, as it is a sensitive and strictly off-limits topic.

Russian news agency Sputnik reported on August 12 that Poland had signed an agreement on the production of 48 launchers of the Patriot surface-to-air missile system, United States Ambassador to Poland Mark Brzezinski claimed on Monday during the signing ceremony.

Under a deal worth $1.23 billion (4.7 billion zloty), the M903 launch stations will be produced at Stalowa Wola steelworks in Poland in co-operation with US defense giant Raytheon Technologies Corp. for which the US approved a $2 billion defense loan to Poland last month. The air defense systems production will run through 2027-2029.

The US has been increasingly looking to outsource production of the systems, with a joint US-Japan project hitting a stumbling block in July, the report noted, though it failed to clarify how Poland’s primitive defense production industry would produce launchers for advanced Patriot missile systems when it could hardly produce 155 mm. artillery shells that Ukraine, under the patronage of the US, had to import from a number of European and Asian countries during the two-year-long war.

Clearly, a behind-the-scenes understanding has been reached that instead of refurbishing “aging Israeli Patriot systems” in the US, the launchers would instead be transferred to Poland where they would be refurbished under the supervision of Raytheon’s technicians and then deployed in the Ukraine War.

During the two-year conflict, Israel’s thriving military-industrial complex has provided plenty of weapons, specifically its cutting-edge drone and missile technology, to Ukraine, but mainstream media, on the instructions of the US security establishment, has been especially careful not to report on the “sensitive topic.”  

Instead, Western media bent over backwards to publish misleading reports at the beginning of the Ukraine War that Ukraine’s Jewish President Volodymyr Zelensky pleaded for Iron Dome missile interceptors, a risible request that Israel allegedly “contemptuously rebuffed,” after which the Zelensky regime had a fictitious spat with Israeli policymakers.

The clear objective of creating this smokescreen around clandestine military co-operation between Washington’s servile surrogates, Ukraine and Israel, was in deference to Israel’s regional security interests. Because Israel frequently mounts airstrikes on Iran-backed militant groups in Lebanon and Syria, whereas Russia has deployed troops, aircraft and S-400 air defense system at Syria’s Mediterranean coast. If Russia gets even an inkling of Israel’s military assistance to Ukraine, then Israel would have to rethink its belligerent attitude.

Nonetheless, besides pledging to refurbish Israeli Patriot missile launchers for Ukraine, Poland also inked a bilateral security agreement with Ukraine on July 8. Among other substantial commitments, the security agreement signed in Warsaw provided for the development of a mechanism for Poland to shoot down Russian missiles and drones fired in the direction of Poland in Ukrainian airspace, which would legally amount to an unequivocal declaration of war between a NATO member state, Poland, and Russia.

President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky during a joint press conference with Prime Minister of Poland Donald Tusk stated: “We are especially grateful for the special arrangements, and this is reflected in the security agreement. It provides for the development of a mechanism to shoot down [by Poland] Russian missiles and drones fired in the airspace of Ukraine in the direction of Poland. I am confident that our teams and the teams of the ministries of defense, together with our military, will work together to work out how we can quickly implement this point of our agreements.”

The vendetta between Russia and Poland, clearly punching above its weight, goes a long way back. In a highly symbolic move expressing solidarity with Ukraine, the prime ministers of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia traveled together to the embattled Ukrainian capital of Kyiv and met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on March 15, 2022, weeks after Russia’s intervention in February.

The “Three Musketeers” took hours-long train trip on their journey from the west Ukrainian city of Lviv to the capital Kyiv, allegedly “endangering their lives” due to security risks involved in traveling within a war zone, though there was no risk to their lives, as such, because they had requested prior permission for the official visit from the Kremlin, which was graciously granted keeping in view diplomatic conventions.

Accompanying the trio of premiers was a “special guest” of the Zelensky regime, Jaroslaw Kaczynski—then the deputy prime minister of Poland, the head of Law and Justice (PiS) Party to which the president and prime minister of Poland belonged and the infamous “puppet master” who hired and fired government executives and ministers on a whim.

Jaroslaw Kaczynski is the twin brother of late President Lech Kaczynski, who died in a plane crash at Smolensk, Russia, in 2010 along with 95 other Poles, among them political and military leaders, as they traveled to commemorate the Katyn massacre that occurred during the Second World War.

Subsequent Polish and international investigations led by independent observers conclusively determined that the crash-landing was an accident caused by fog and pilot error. Still, Kaczynski had long suspected that Russian President Vladimir Putin had a role in provoking the accident, and was harboring a personal grudge against the Russian president.

The Polish electorate dispensed poetic justice to kingmaker Kaczynski as he was ousted from power following the October 2023 parliamentary elections in Poland due to his myopic and vindictive policies and Donald Tusk was elected prime minister of the coalition government.

Tusk is a seasoned politician and diplomat who was the President of the European Council from 2014 to 2019. It was expected of him to display statesmanship and revisit the confrontational approach of his predecessors. But clearly, he is going down the same path of perdition that proved fatal not only for egocentric and spiteful politicians but for the Poles as a nation.