How Deep State Scuttled Ukraine Peace Process

A day after trilateral meeting between United States, Ukraine and Russia concluded in Abu Dhabi on February 5, resulting in confidence-building measure of prisoner exchange involving over 300 prisoners of war, Lieutenant General Vladimir Alexeyev was shot and critically injured by a hired assassin in Moscow. Alexeyev is a deputy of the head of Russian GRU military agency, Admiral Igor Kostyukov, who was leading the Russian delegation.

In January, Moscow accused Kyiv of trying to strike a residence of President Vladimir Putin in Russia's northern Novgorod region with over ninety long-range attack drones. Kremlin said Russia would review its negotiating position in ongoing talks with the United States on ending the Ukraine war.

A video posted on the Russian Defense Ministry's Telegram channel showed Admiral Igor Kostyukov handing to the US attaché what he described as the controlling mechanism of a drone found among downed fragments. "The decryption of the content of the memory of the navigation controller of the drones carried out by specialists of Russia's special services confirms without question that the target of the attack was the complex of buildings of the Russian president's residence in Novgorod region," Kostyukov said.

Similarly, last June, Ukraine mounted Operation Spiderweb, in which Ukrainian drones struck deep inside Russia targeting strategic bombers, in order to scuttle peace talks between Russia and Ukraine happening in Turkey, after the inauguration of Mr. Trump as president, who had made an electoral pledge of resolving the Ukraine conflict as soon as possible after being elected president.

Despite Trump admin’s indisputable sincerity in resolving the deadly conflict, the charade of peace negotiations has been going on for four years but the elusive peace deal has repeatedly been scuttled by certain opportunistic quarters in US military that are hell bent on engaging Russia in a protracted war of attrition in order to degrade military capabilities of Cold War-era rival.

Fact of the matter is Ukraine War was over before it even began, in the first month of the war, after Russia achieved its central military objectives in Donbas region of eastern Ukraine. In the early days of Russia’s military campaign in Ukraine, the Washington Post reported in March 2022: “The main threat to Kyiv appears to be a massive Russian convoy, about 40 miles long, approaching Kyiv from the northwest and believed to be about 20 miles from the capital and stuck near a cargo airport.”

Dubious Ukrainian claims of having repelled Russia’s assault on the capital by mounting guerrilla warfare tactics to the contrary, it’s an incontestable fact that the “40-mile-long” military convoy of battle tanks, armored vehicles and heavy artillery that descended from Belarus in the north and reached the outskirts of Kyiv in the early days of the war without encountering much resistance en route the capital was simply a decoy astutely designed as a diversionary tactic by Russia’s military strategists in order to force Ukrainian forces to scramble to defend the embattled country’s capital and deter military command from sending reinforcements to Donbas in east Ukraine where real battles for territory were fiercely fought.

All the towns from the Belarus border to the northern approaches of the capital fell in quick succession. Russian forces continued advancing from the northwest of Kyiv, capturing Bucha, Hostomel and Vorzel on the outskirts of the capital by March 5, and Irpin by March 9, 2022.

Quite astonishingly, however, instead of mounting a long-awaited assault on the capital, it was reported on March 11, 2022, that the convoy had largely dispersed, taking up positions in forests around the capital, before withdrawing back to Belarus after Russia’s announcement of scaling back military campaign in north Ukraine at Istanbul peace initiative on March 29, 2022.

Clearly, commanders of the military convoy had explicit instructions to spare the city of four million people. The indiscriminate bombardment of the densely populated Ukrainian capital and ensuing urban warfare would inevitably have caused thousands of needless civilian casualties. Therefore, Russia’s military brass decided to spare the rest of the embattled country and restricted Russian military offensive on liberating Russian-majority Donbas region in east Ukraine.

Shortly thereafter, at Istanbul peace initiative in March 2022, Russian Deputy Defense Minister Alexander Fomin, leading the Russian peace delegation in Istanbul talks, told reporters: “In order to increase mutual trust and create the necessary conditions for further negotiations and achieving the ultimate goal of agreeing and signing an agreement, a decision was made to radically, by a large margin, reduce military activity in the Kyiv and Chernihiv directions.”

Ukrainian negotiators said that under their proposals, Kyiv would agree not to join alliances or host bases of foreign troops, but would have security guarantees in terms similar to Article 5, the collective defense clause of the transatlantic NATO military alliance.

“Ukrainian negotiators have essentially agreed to Russia's principal security demands of rejecting NATO membership and regarding the presence of foreign military bases on its territory,” the Kremlin's chief negotiator Vladimir Medinsky, who is ironically still leading Russian delegation in Geneva four years later, told Sputnik News in March 2022.

“The combat potential of the Ukrainian Armed Forces has been significantly reduced, which allows us to focus our main attention and efforts on achieving the main goal—the liberation of Donbas,” then-Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu proudly boasted in March 2022.

Following Istanbul peace initiative in March 2022, in the spirit of apparent “reconciliation and multilateralism” defining the Biden administration’s approach to conducting international diplomacy, then-US Secretary of State Antony Blinken handed over the “power of attorney” to the Ukrainian president to offer Russia relief from international sanctions in exchange for ending its military offensive in Ukraine.

On April 3, confirming in an NBC News interview that Zelensky—then one of the most ambitious emerging new leaders in Central Europe, not to be mistaken for an imperialist stooge—had the ability to negotiate sanctions relief for peace, Blinken, while assuming the air of magnanimity and rapprochement, revealed that President Joe Biden’s administration would support whatever the Ukrainian people wanted to do to bring the war to an end.

“We’ll be looking to see what Ukraine is doing and what it wants to do,” Blinken said. “And if it concludes that it can bring this war to an end, stop the death and destruction and continue to assert its independence and its sovereignty – and ultimately that requires the lifting of sanctions – of course, we will allow that.”

Contradicting misleading reports hailing Ukraine’s imperial stooges as purported “masters of their own destinies,” however, President Joe Biden told the EU leaders at a summit in Brussels in March 2022 that “any notion that we are going to be out of this in a month is wrong, and that the EU needed to prepare for a long-term pressure campaign against Russia.”

“US and European officials voiced skepticism over Russia’s sincerity and commitment towards the peace talks, underlining that only a full ceasefire, troop withdrawal and return of captured territory to Ukraine would be enough to trigger discussions over lifting sanctions on Russia’s economy.

“Western countries were discussing both enforcement of existing sanctions and drawing up potential additional measures to increase pressure on Russian president Vladimir Putin,” senior EU and US officials confided to the Financial Times.

Advising Ukrainians to hold out instead of rushing for securing peace deal with Russia, the Sunday Times reported, senior British officials were urging Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to instruct his negotiators “to refuse to make concessions during peace negotiations with Russian counterparts.”

“A senior government source said there were concerns that allies were over-eager to secure an early peace deal, adding that a settlement should be reached only when Ukraine is in the strongest possible position.”

In a phone call, then-British Prime Minister Boris Johnson warned President Zelensky that President Putin was a “liar and a bully” who would use talks to “wear you down and force you to make concessions.” The British prime minister also told MPs it was “certainly inconceivable that any sanctions could be taken off simply because there is a ceasefire.” London was making sure there was “no backsliding on sanctions by any of our friends and partners around the world,” he added.

Leaving Orwellian doublespeak of American and European statesmen aside, in a significantly escalatory move virtually sinking Istanbul peace initiative to the bottom of Black Sea, Ukraine's Operational Command South announced in April 2022 that it had hit a Russian warship with a “Ukrainian-made Neptune anti-ship missile” that was operating roughly 60 miles south off the coast of Odesa in southeast Ukraine and that it had started to sink. “In the Black Sea operational zone, Neptune anti-ship cruise missiles hit the cruiser Moskva, the flagship of the Russian Black Sea Fleet—it received significant damage,” the Ukrainian statement said.

A Russian government statement acknowledged: “A fire broke out. Other units of the ship’s group tried to help, but a storm and a powerful explosion of ammunition overturned the cruiser and it began to sink.” Although the Russian statement initially claimed the cruiser “remained afloat” and measures were being taken to tow it to port, it later admitted the warship had sunk as four Russian ships that had gone to the Moskva’s rescue were hampered by bad weather and by ammunition exploding on board.

Russian news agencies said the 611-foot-long (186 meters) Moskva, with a crew of almost 500, was commissioned in 1983 and refurbished in 1998. It was one of the three cruisers in Russia’s formidable Black Sea Fleet. The Moskva was armed with a range of anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles as well as torpedoes and naval guns and close-in missile defense systems, including 16 anti-ship Vulkan cruise missiles with a range of at least 700 km (440 miles).

Reportedly, the warship was also carrying S-300 anti-air missiles, which were crucial to Russia’s air-defense capabilities over Crimea. It was the first time Moscow had lost a cruiser since German planes sank the Chervona Ukraina (Red Ukraine) in 1941 at Sevastopol – the Crimean naval base.

Although Ukraine claimed the Russian warship was struck by a “Ukrainian-made Neptune anti-ship missile,” developed domestically based on the Soviet KH-35 cruise missile that became operational in the Ukrainian naval forces in 2021, Politico reported in March 2022 that Kyiv had specifically demanded “long-range anti-ship missiles” from Washington.

Lending credence to the reports the United States had delivered Harpoon anti-ship missiles to Ukraine, the Washington Post reported in March: “During an official visit, a Ukrainian special operations commander told Rep. Michael Waltz (R-Fla.), Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.) and other lawmakers that they were shifting training and planning to focus on maintaining an armed opposition, relying on insurgent-like tactics.

“Ukrainian officials told the lawmakers that they were frustrated that the United States had not sent Harpoon missiles to target Russian ships and Stinger missiles to attack Russian aircraft, Moulton and Waltz said in separate interviews.”

In addition to the CIA’s clandestine program for training Ukraine’s largely conscript military and allied neo-Nazi militias in Donbas in east Ukraine aimed at cultivating an anti-Russian insurgency in Ukraine, and the US Special Forces program for training Ukraine’s security forces at Yavoriv Combat Training Center in the western part of the country bordering Poland, the Pentagon revealed in April 2022 that it had also been training Ukrainian troops that were inside the US before Russia launched its invasion.

The Ukrainian naval cadets were participating in a pre-scheduled professional military education program at the Naval Small Craft Instruction and Technical Training School in Biloxi, Mississippi, when Russia's invasion of Ukraine began on Feb. 24, according to Pentagon’s then-Press Secretary John F. Kirby. 

“That school is a security cooperation school, operating under the US Special Operations Command in support of foreign security assistance and geographic combatant commanders’ theater security cooperation priorities. The Ukrainian forces received training on patrol craft operations, communications and maintenance.

“Since the conclusion of the course in early March, the Department of Defense provided the group additional advanced tactical training on the systems the United States has provided to Ukraine, including on the Switchblade unmanned aerial vehicle. Several batches of Ukrainian naval cadets trained at the Naval Training School in Biloxi, Mississippi, have already returned home to Ukraine and were deployed in Odesa and the rest are now headed back to Ukraine,” Kirby said.

Besides receiving advanced tactical training on operating the Switchblade kamikaze drones and unmanned coastal defense boats, included in the additional $800 million in military assistance to Ukraine announced by the Biden administration in April, the Ukrainian naval cadets also received training on operating long-range anti-ship missiles in the United States.

Clearly, the US-trained Ukrainian naval forces deployed in Odesa in the southeast scored two hits of Harpoon anti-ship missiles on the Russian guided-missile cruiser Moskva operating 60 miles south off the coast of Odesa that punched a hole in the warship’s hull and ignited a blaze that, in turn, caused the massive amount of ammunition loaded on the cruiser to explode, and the battleship subsequently sank to the bottom of the Black Sea.

Dispelling dubious Ukrainian claim of having sank Russian cruiser with domestically built Neptune anti-ship missiles and conclusively determining the military operation to sink Moskva was planned and orchestrated by Pentagon, the Daily Mail revealed in April: “US maritime surveillance plane was over Black Sea minutes before Russian flagship Moskva was hit by missiles.”

“The US Navy used its new marine surveillance aircraft to provide accurate targeting data to Ukrainian forces to sink the Russian Black Sea flag ship Moskva on April 13. P-8 Poseidon aircraft is packed with state-of-the-art surveillance equipment which can track surface vessels and submarines at ranges of more than 100 miles.

“P-8 left US Naval Air Station Sigonella in Sicily on April 13, hours before the attack. Before reaching the Black Sea coastline, the Poseidon turned off its trackers, so it could no longer be followed online. The aircraft was 'hidden' for almost three hours before it returned to Flight Radar 24.

“The US Navy refused to confirm if it assisted Ukraine with the attack by providing intelligence data. A Defense source added: 'In keeping with our support to NATO’s eastern flank, we have been conducting some limited air patrols off the coast of Romania. But we will not speak on the details of operational matters.’”

How CIA and Mossad Sabotaged Palestinian Resistance

Israel was created amidst oil-rich Arab World during World War II lest Baathist Arab socialist states might fall under the Soviet sphere of influence in the backdrop of the Cold War. Therefore, like the infamous McCarthyite agitprop of the sixties engendering Russophobia amongst gullible Western masses, the naïve sheeple were also inoculated against perils of anti-Semitism to the extent where it became practically impossible to denounce even Zionist hegemony in the Arab World.

This puerile reverse prejudice still persists in the West and anti-Zionist voices are promptly silenced and pro-Palestine activists are ostracized from mainstream discourse. Under the auspices of formidable tools of coercion deployed by the deep state to dominate political narratives in Western countries, misplaced sympathy for Zionist tyranny has penetrated subconscious of Western subjects to such an extent that they reflexively overlook the Palestinian holocaust perpetrated by self-styled “champions of human rights,” lest the critics of Israeli oppression are branded as anti-Semites.

Although theoretical framework of Jewish state was posited by Balfour Declaration of 1917 by the end of First World War, Israel was in fact practically conceived in the 1940s by the US deep state. During World War II, the Allied and Axis powers used oil as a weapon by enforcing naval blockades of ships carrying fuel, thus crippling military capabilities of adversaries.

Realizing the critical significance of abundant oil reserves of the Persian Gulf, Israel was created amidst the Arab World as military outpost of Imperial United States and its armed forces were trained, organized and equipped with sophisticated American weapons as Zionist Corps of the US CENTCOM. Even Israel’s nuclear program was presented to rentier state wrapped in gift paper by US security establishment.

After decline of Anglo-French Empire following World War II, Imperial United States emerged as its successor. After the Arab World gained independence in 1950s, Baathist Arab socialist political forces formed governments in several Arab states. This fact engendered apprehensions in Western capitals that the oil-rich Arab World might fall under the Soviet sphere of influence.

Therefore, the CIA and Israeli Mossad, operating hand in glove, infiltrated Palestinian liberation movement with spies, double agents and criminal elements, such as German neo-Nazis and Latin American narcotics smugglers. These infiltrators mounted false flag black-ops, including Black September hijackings and the Munich Olympics massacre of 1972, in order to vilify Palestinian resistance as “terrorist organizations,” thus legitimizing the creation of Zionist state.

After being evicted from their homeland following creation of Israel, Palestinian refugees took shelter in neighboring Jordan. But the subversive activities of saboteurs infiltrated in Palestine liberation movement in Jordan culminated in the Dawson's Field hijackings of 6 September 1970, when criminal elements masquerading as Palestinian freedom fighters seized three civilian passenger flights and forced their landing in the Jordanian city of Zarqa, where they took foreign nationals as hostages and blew up the planes in front of international press.

The hijackings were in fact orchestrated by CIA in order to dislodge Palestinian refugees from Jordan, constituting a security threat to Israel. Notably, during the hijackings, there were no civilian casualties. Only one hijacker, Patrick Argüello, was killed during the unsuccessful hijacking of an international flight from Tel Aviv to New York City. Arguello was a Nicaraguan American born in San Francisco, California, who was clearly an intelligence informant and used to do “dirty work” for American spy agencies.

The hijackings provided a pretext to Jordan’s King Hussein who ordered the Jordanian Army to crackdown on Palestinian refugees in Jordan, leading to the infamous Black September massacre.

Former Special Forces Captain Netanyahu was also an operative on the payroll of deep state and is privy to dirty tricks played by Israeli intelligence in collaboration with American spy agencies to demonize Palestinian resistance movement.

In May 1972, a Belgian Sabena Airline flight from Brussels to Tel Aviv was hijacked by four hippies, two men and two women, addicted to opium and heroin and claiming to belong to Black September Organization – a coproduction of CIA and Mossad to discredit legit Palestinian liberation movement.

The drug junkies pretending to be hijackers had two handguns, which they apparently discovered hidden inside flush tank of aircraft’s toilet like the cunning plot of Hollywood epic Godfather. But the useful idiots didn’t realize they were given blank ammo that only makes noise without firing a shot.

A team of Israeli commandos, led by Epstein mate Ehud Barak and including Netanyahu, was promptly dispatched to neutralize wannabe terrorists. Disguised as aircraft technicians, commandos raided the aircraft, killing two male hijackers and capturing two female concubines while rescuing the hostages.

During the one-sided firefight, as hijackers were shooting blank ammo, Netanyahu was shot in the arm by one of his colleagues. After the blockbuster thriller was screened in cinema houses in Israel and across Western World, Barak and Netanyahu were hailed as national icons and both were subsequently elected premiers.

Although this satire is getting rather lengthy for the fast age of digital era, I’ll recount just one more tragicomic episode and let readers figure out themselves rest of hijackings of sixties and seventies typically attributed to Palestinian liberation movement.

In July 1976, an Air France flight between Tel Aviv and Paris was similarly hijacked by four hijackers, two of whom allegedly belonged to Palestinian resistance while the remaining two were German neo-Nazis, and was forced to land at Uganda’s Entebbe airport.

It’s noteworthy that Uganda’s military dictator Idi Amin initially enjoyed considerable support from United States and Israel, though he later fell out of favor. Hence, Amin and Uganda’s military commanders were taken into confidence for letting Israeli commandos mount choreographed raid at Entebbe airport.

Shortly thereafter, a team of hundred Israeli commandos was hastily assembled. The commandos raided the Entebbe airport, killing hijackers and rescuing hostages. But during the raid, Benjamin Netanyahu’s older brother Lt. Col. Yonatan Netanyahu was also accidentally killed.

It’s noteworthy that in almost all of these hijackings of sixties and seventies naively attributed to Palestinian liberation movement, plots were quite similar: hippies addicted to narcotics posing as freedom fighters, accomplices included German neo-Nazis and Latin American drug smugglers, such as Carlos the Jackal, after making international news headlines, purported hijackers were easily overpowered in commando raids and were immediately killed lest they spill secrets, and hostages were effortlessly rescued with minimum collateral damage.

Excluding the Munich Olympics massacre in 1972, in which a dozen victims lost their lives. But that was a botched operation as German police officials weren’t privy to the plot. CIA and Mossad assumed that the terrorists and hostages would be granted safe passage, and indeed a Boeing 727 was waiting on the tarmac to fly them out of Germany.

But foolhardy German police deployed snipers at the airport, attempting to shoot hijackers and rescue hostages. This led to the carnage in which precious lives were lost. Typically, however, CIA and Mossad’s false flag subversive operations, vilifying Palestinian resistance across the world, were quite flawless and surgical, but occasional mishaps do happen when operational miscalculations cause collateral damage.

How Indian Deep State Wiped Out Gandhi Dynasty

Readers would be amazed to find out that world’s so-called “largest democracy” is in fact ruled not by elected politicians but by powerful military brass. That over the course of India’s tumultuous history has brazenly assassinated two prime ministers, Indira and Rajiv Gandhi, thus wiping out the Nehru-Gandhi political dynasty, constituting hereditary leadership of India’s only liberal party, Indian National Congress, and replacing it with a Hindu fascist and servile stooge of deep state, Narendra Modi.

How ironic that only two generals in Indian army were promoted out of turn as army chiefs and both were brutally assassinated. One was Gen. Arun Kumar Vaidya who was appointed army chief by Indira Gandhi in 1983 and the other was Bipin Rawat who was appointed army chief by Modi in 2016 while superseding two senior officers.

Following the gruesome assassination of Indira Gandhi in 1984, her handpicked army chief Gen. Arun Kumar Vaidya also met predestined fate in 1986, only several months after retirement. Both assassinations were alleged to be carried out by Sikhs, but in fact the murder plots had fingerprints of deep state all over, in the backdrop of Siachen conflict and Indian army’s nefarious plot to mount pre-emptive airstrikes on Pakistan’s nuclear installations in the Orwellian year 1984, as disclosed by the US State Dept.’s documents declassified in 2015.

Reagan admin had warned Pakistan in 1984 that India was planning to mount a pre-emptive strike at its nuclear installations before Pakistan could produce adequate stockpile of nuclear warheads constituting a powerful deterrent against future Indian aggression. This information was conveyed to Gen. Zia-ul-Haq in a confidential letter written by President Ronald Reagan on Sept 12, 1984, delivered by Ambassador Hinton, American ambassador to Islamabad.

Reagan’s fear was based on a CIA analysis, which noted in July 1984 that Indian security establishment viewed a Pakistani nuclear threat as imminent. The CIA analysis also added that “an Indian attack on Pakistani nuclear facilities would almost certainly prompt retaliatory strikes against Indian nuclear facilities and probably lead to a full-scale war.”

Besides Pakistan’s nuclear program, another factor that heightened friction between traditional adversaries was Siachen conflict. In 1984, India treacherously mounted Operation Meghdoot to take control of strategically vital Siachen Glacier in Ladakh region, bordering Pakistan and China.

In this backdrop, India’s military brass was requesting permission from the gov’t of Indira Gandhi to mount a pre-emptive strike at Pakistan’s nuclear installations. After Ms. Gandhi denied permission due to fear of full-scale war between traditional rivals, deep state instructed two Sikh bodyguards of Ms. Gandhi, Satwant Singh and Beant Singh, to kill her.

Gunmen belonging to Sikh faith were chosen as assassins because Ms. Gandhi had ordered conducting Operation Blue Star at Golden Temple in Amritsar in June 1984. Thus, the Sikh faith of alleged murderers provided an expedient alibi to real assassins to obfuscate the actual sinister motive of the assassination. It defies common sense as to why Ms. Gandhi would keep Sikh bodyguards in security detail despite mounting military operation at the holiest temple of Sikhism.

In order to erase incriminating evidence and forestall confessional statement that might have spilled the secret, ringleader of hitmen, Beant Singh, was shot dead at the spot, while brainwashed patsies, Satwant and Kehar Singh, were later hanged in Delhi’s Tihar prison.

Incidentally, Indira Gandhi’s heir apparent Sanjay Gandhi had also died in suspicious circumstances, after he lost control of his aeroplane while performing an aerobatic maneuver and crashed in the Diplomatic Enclave of New Delhi in June 1980. Sanjay had previously survived an assassination attempt in March 1977 after unknown gunmen fired at his car from 300 meters during an election campaign in New Delhi.

Indira Gandhi’s second son and arguably last scion of fabled Nehru-Gandhi dynasty Rajiv Gandhi, who served as the prime minister of India from 1984 to 1989, was similarly assassinated in May 1991 by India’s deep state due to his pacifist role in Operation Brasstacks, a military exercise conducted by India’s armed forces along Pakistan’s border, and for withdrawing military support to Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka, where a power struggle was ongoing between India and China.

Operation Brasstacks was a massive military exercise of the Indian Armed Forces in the state of Rajasthan along Pakistan’s border from November 1986 to January 1987, mobilizing half a million Indian troops. The operation's aim was to provoke Pakistan to respond and this would’ve provided India with a pretext to mount pre-emptive strikes at its nuclear installations before Pakistan could produce adequate stockpile of nuclear warheads constituting a permanent deterrent against prospective Indian aggressions.

India’s then-Army Chief General Sundarji did not inform Rajiv Gandhi, then newly appointed prime minister following assassination of Indira Gandhi in 1984, about the scale of the operation and important details were hidden from him. Indian army lobbied the government multiple times, but unsuccessfully, to attack Pakistan.

The war was averted only due to shrewd “Cricket Diplomacy” conducted by Pakistani Gen. Zia-ul-Haq. With Indian troops amassed along the Pakistani border in early 1987, the morning of Feb 21, 1987, presented an altogether different surprise: a Pakistan Air Force jet landed at Delhi airport, with the visitor none other than Pakistan President General Zia-ul-Haq.

The general had flown to Delhi on the pretext of watching a test match between Pakistan and India in Jaipur. Wisdom ultimately prevailed, and the next day, Rajiv met Gen. Zia for dinner. Negotiations were held in cordial atmosphere with intention of reducing tensions at the border. The leaders agreed that in the first phase, both countries would drawdown troops from borders.

But this peacemaking overture precipitated a rift between India’s security establishment and political leadership which, alongside withdrawing India’s military support to Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka, a Hindu militant organization notorious for inventing suicide bombing, became a reason for Rajiv’s fall from grace and eventual assassination in May 1991.

As Rajiv was campaigning for general elections in India slated from May to June 1991, he was killed at an election rally near Chennai by a female suicide bomber allegedly belonging to Tamil Tigers. As with scapegoating Sikhs for assassinating his mother Indira Gandhi, deep state deployed the plausible alibi of Tamil militants killing Rajiv as retribution to cover its tracks in the brazen murder of Rajiv Gandhi.

Lastly, Bipin Rawat served as the first Chief of Defense Staff of the Indian Armed Forces from January 2020 until his death in a helicopter crash in December 2021. He was regarded as a “political general” and Narendra Modi’s lackey. Despite completing three-year tenure as army chief, the new position of Chief of Defense Staff was created in January 2020 to accommodate him, because Modi wouldn’t trust anybody to lead India’s behemoth armed forces besides him.

Modi had trouble finding Rawat’s replacement, and eventually National Security Advisor Ajit Doval’s protégé Anil Chauhan was brought back from retirement to be appointed as Chief of Defense Staff, which is a ceremonial post equivalent to Pakistan’s since-abolished Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff appointment. Indian army’s de facto head has traditionally been army chief, a powerful appointment currently held by Gen. Upendra Dwivedi.

Bipin Rawat was despised by India’s military brass, because despite suffering two humiliating defeats – India’s airstrikes on Pakistan following Pulwama attack in Feb. 2019 when an Indian aircraft was shot down by PAF and pilot held captive and the Galwan incident in disputed Kashmir in May 2020 in which Chinese troops beat to death scores of Indian soldiers – still Rawat was continuing to lead India’s army and there was no way to get rid of him because he had Modi’s blessings.

On fateful morning of December 8, 2021, Rawat’s Mi-17 helicopter took off from the Sulur Air Force Base in Tamil Nadu but failed to reach the destination at Wellington Cantonment, because a bomb aboard the chopper exploded, killing all 14 people onboard, including Rawat and his wife. I don’t mean to implicate Gen. Manoj Naravane in the “typical air crash” but he was army chief at the time of Rawat’s death, who incidentally oversaw counter-insurgency ops and was adept in executing assassination techniques.

Incumbent Chief of Defense Staff Anil Chauhan should also be careful while boarding decrepit aircraft, because India’s antiquated aircraft fleet has a history of “technical malfunctions” and “pilot errors” leading to fatal crashes, while boss of the bosses Army Chief Upendra Dwivedi is yearning to restore military discipline and professionalism by eliminating political appointees from Indian armed forces.

 

Deep State Antics: From Kennedys to Clintons

In retrospect, Hitler’s worst strategic debacle that ultimately cost the Nazi Germany World War II was invading Russia before crushing the British peril following the precipitous rout of the French military at the beginning of the war in June 1940. The only reason the megalomaniac Fuhrer didn’t initially commit enough military resources into crossing the English Channel and dismantling the Anglo-American Empire once and for all was that ruling elites of the two nations were tied together by blood relations.

Kaiser Wilhelm, the last deposed emperor of the House of Hohenzollern that ruled Germany until the end of the First World War, was the eldest grandchild of British Queen Victoria. Wilhelm's first cousins included King George V of the United Kingdom and many princesses who, along with Wilhelm's sister Sophia, became European consorts. Similarly, the German political and social elites of the Second and Third Reich regarded the Anglo-Saxon aristocracy of the United Kingdoms as kinsmen not to be invaded.

In the Second World War, the Nazi air force did mount Luftwaffe attacks on a limited scale targeting Britain’s industrial infrastructure, but the tiny island boasting imperial legacy was simply not a match for the Third Reich’s military strength without the assistance of its transatlantic ally, the United States. Thankfully, British islands were spared the pulverizing force of the Nazi Blitzkrieg experienced by France and rest of continental Europe.

According to a 1978 essay by German historian Andreas Hillgruber, the Russia invasion plans drawn up by the German military elite were colored by hubris stemming from the rapid defeat of France at the hands of the invincible Wehrmacht and by traditional German stereotypes of Russia as a primitive, backward Asiatic country, having Turco-Mongol ancestry, a fallacious superiority complex predicated on the Nazi social Darwinism and the cherished myth of the German and Anglo-Saxon racial superiority.

Had Hitler been familiar with European history and been aware of the Napoleonic army’s harrowing fate in its botched military campaign in Russia in 1812, he would never have committed the blunder of invading Russia to create so-called Lebensraum or “living space” for the German race.

Russia defeated the military forces of Napoleon and Hitler through “strategic depth” of its vast territorial possessions spanning almost the entire northern landmass of Eurasian region, by letting Napoleonic and Nazi military forces advance into Russian territory, extending their supply lines, burdening logistics and mounting ferocious guerrilla warfare campaign that decimated the morale and military capabilities of the most invincible armies of the respective eras.

Russian fatalities during the Second World War ranged from 20 to 27 million, according to various estimates, including over 8 million military fatalities. In comparison, the United States lost 400,000 soldiers during the war. Clearly, Russia paid the most sacrifices and defeated Nazism while the United States misappropriated the credit for salvaging the world from the menace of fascism in the imagination of the subjects of the Anglo-American Empire.

In truth, Nazi and fascist are meaningless and subjective slurs crafted as astute propaganda stratagems to vilify adversaries, while almost all imperial and militarist powers use more or less similar oppressive tactics to subdue and subjugate vanquished nations. After all, it wasn’t Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy or so-called totalitarian states of Russia, China and North Korea that hold the unique distinction of being the only military power that detonated atomic bombs and obliterated populated cities of a vanquished adversary.

Before the end of the Second World War, when Japan was about to fall in the hands of geographically adjacent Soviet Union, the Truman administration authorized the use of nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to subjugate Japan and send a clear message to the leaders of the former Soviet Union, which had not developed its nuclear program at the time, to desist from encroaching upon Japan in the east and West Germany in Europe.

The United States military publicly confessed to over 30 Broken Arrows, serious nuclear accidents, including accidentally dropping atom bombs on populated areas in the US and Europe that thankfully didn’t explode, though the real number of such nuclear accidents is calculated to be in thousands, particularly at the height of the Cold War during the sixties when such apocalyptic “accidents” were everyday occurrence. Thus, the United States came close to making the planet uninhabitable for the rest of humanity due to its unfettered nuclear arms race and global domination agenda.

After the Soviet Union developed its nuclear program, the transatlantic military alliance NATO was conceived in 1949 during the Cold War to offset the military advantage of the former Soviet Union which was geographically adjacent to Europe. According to Article 5 of the treaty, an attack on any member state would be deemed an attack on all, hence enshrining the collective defense clause.

Historically, the NATO military alliance, at least ostensibly, was conceived as a defensive alliance in order to offset conventional warfare superiority of the former Soviet Union. The US forged collective defense pact with the Western European nations after the Soviet Union reached the threshold to build its first atomic bomb in 1949 and achieved nuclear parity with the US.

In the heyday of the Cold War in the sixties when 400,000 US forces were deployed in Europe that were still outnumbered by Soviet troops, the Soviet leadership made repeated requests for signing a “no first use” nuclear treaty precluding the likelihood of pre-emptive nuclear strike, but the United States balked at the proposal due to conventional warfare superiority of the USSR in Europe.

Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev even unilaterally pledged against the first use of nuclear weapons in 1982, though Russia has since dropped the pledge in 1993 following the break-up of the Soviet Union and consequent tilting of balance of power in favor of the United States. During the Cold War, however, particularly in the 1960s, Soviet Union had a clear military advantage over United States and the formidable Red Army could’ve overrun entire continent of Europe if it hadn’t been for NATO’s collective defense umbrella.

In this backdrop at the height of the Cold War when the domestic American politics was infested with McCarthyite paranoia and communists were persecuted all over the country, John F. Kennedy was elected president in November 1960 whose naïve ideals mirrored “What's so funny ‘bout peace, love and understanding” of John Lennon and the antiwar hippy ilk.

Deep state tried to put up with Kennedy’s liberal idealism for a while but the schism between pacifist administration and security establishment reached a tipping point following the Cuban missile crisis in 1962 leading to the assassination of JFK in November 1963.

Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin of John F. Kennedy, was picked up as a scapegoat because he had visited Russia and Cuba before the hit-job in order to put the blame for the high-profile political assassination on communists.

Not surprisingly, Oswald was silenced by Jack Ruby before he could open his mouth and prove innocence in the courts of law. The cold-blooded murder of a pacifist and non-interventionist American president was obviously perpetrated by a professional sniper on the payroll of the deep state.

Notably, Kennedy was killed in November 1963, and months later, the Gulf of Tonkin resolution authorized Lyndon B. Johnson to directly engage in the Vietnam conflict in August 1964 on the basis of a false flag naval engagement.

Clearly, security establishment was the only beneficiary of the assassination of Kennedy. Most likely, the deep state turned on Kennedy after the October 1962 Cuban missile crisis and Kennedy’s pacifist rhetoric and conciliatory approach toward Washington’s arch-rival, the former Soviet Union, in the backdrop of the Cold War.

Besides the Cuban missile crisis of 1962, another reason the Kennedy administration fell from the grace of the deep state was the botched Bay of Pigs invasion by CIA operatives and Cuban exiles in April 1961 to topple the government of Fidel Castro that JFK approved but later severely castigated CIA for the fiasco and sacked CIA director Allen Dulles and several associates. The security establishment wanted Kennedy to immediately order the invasion of Cuba following the foiled plot but he vacillated and let a golden opportunity to dismantle a major security threat in the US backyard slip by.

Similarly, JFK’s brother Robert F. Kennedy was a leading Democratic candidate for the presidential office when he was shot dead by a Palestinian Christian Sirhan Sirhan in June 1968. Being a pacifist himself, Bobby Kennedy opposed the US involvement in the Vietnam War and wrote a book on the Cuban missile crisis of 1962 in which he credited his brother JFK for showing restraint and amicably resolving the crisis.

As the former attorney general of JFK, Bobby Kennedy evidently had good leads on the masterminds of the JFK assassination, and wanted to avenge his brother’s shocking murder by exposing the assassins after being elected president. This was the reason he too was silenced before he could be elected president.

Though serving a life sentence at a California penitentiary, Bobby Kennedy’s murderer Sirhan, now an octogenarian, is a suspicious and deranged character, who frequently backtracked on his testimonies during and after the trial, had no recollection of the murder and subsequent events, and his defense team had pleaded for a retrial several times but the request was summarily denied. He was due to be released on parole in August 2021 but California Governor Gavin Newsom has repeatedly decided against setting him free.

JFK and RFK’s third and youngest brother Ted Kennedy also had presidential ambitions. He was elected senator in November 1962. Ted Kennedy was known for his oratorical skills, and his 1968 eulogy for his brother Robert was regarded as his best speech. He ran in 1980 in the Democratic primary campaign for the party's nomination, but lost to the incumbent president, Jimmy Carter.

On June 19, 1964, Ted Kennedy was a passenger in a private Aero Commander 680 airplane that was flying in bad weather from Washington, D.C. to Massachusetts. The plane crashed into an apple orchard in Southampton, Massachusetts, on final approach to the Barnes Municipal Airport in Westfield. The pilot and Edward Moss, one of Kennedy's aides, were killed. Kennedy was pulled from the wreckage, and spent months in hospital recovering from a back injury, a punctured lung, broken ribs and internal bleeding. He suffered chronic back pain for the rest of his life.

Following Republican Richard Nixon's victory in November 1968, Kennedy was assumed to be the front-runner for the 1972 Democratic nomination. In January 1969, Kennedy defeated Louisiana Senator Russell B. Long by a 31–26 margin to become Senate Majority Whip, which further boosted his presidential image. But a mysterious event in July of that year ruined his odds of being elected president.

On the night of July 18, 1969, Kennedy was at Chappaquiddick Island, Massachusetts, hosting a booze party for the Boiler Room Girls, a group of young women who had worked on his brother Robert's presidential campaign. Kennedy left the party with 28-year-old Mary Jo Kopechne in drunk state.

While driving a car, he attempted to cross the Dike Bridge, which did not have a guardrail. Kennedy then lost control and crashed in a pond. He swam to shore and left the scene in a state of panic while being intoxicated, while his girlfriend, Kopechne, was trapped inside the vehicle and was found dead later. Kennedy did not report the accident until the next morning for which he was given a suspended sentence of two months in jail.

The last scion of illustrious Kennedy family who had presidential ambitions was charismatic son of JFK and veritable crown prince of USA, John F. Kennedy Jr. He was an attorney and publicist who was quite active in politics. Kennedy Jr. addressed the 1988 Democratic National Convention in Atlanta, introducing his uncle Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts.

He participated in his cousin Patrick J. Kennedy's campaign for a seat in the Rhode Island House of Representatives by visiting the district. He also campaigned in Boston for his uncle Ted Kennedy's re-election to the Senate against challenger Mitt Romney in 1994. He could have inherited the presidential throne vacated by his father like a hereditary monarch.

But on fateful day of July 16, 1999, Kennedy Jr. departed from Fairfield, New Jersey, piloting his Piper Saratoga light aircraft with his wife Carolyn and sister-in-law Lauren Bessette as passengers for Hyannis Port, Massachusetts, to attend the wedding of his cousin Rory Kennedy.

Kennedy Jr. had checked in with the control tower at the Martha's Vineyard Airport, but the plane was reported missing after it failed to arrive on schedule. The wreckage of the shattered plane was found strewn over a broad area of seabed 120 feet below the surface. The Coast Guard and Navy divers found Carolyn's and Lauren's bodies near the twisted and broken fuselage while Kennedy's body was still strapped into the pilot's seat.

Similar to Kennedy presidency at the height of Cold War in sixties, Bill Clinton was inaugurated president after the most momentous event in contemporary history: dissolution of Soviet Union, colored revolutions in Eastern Europe and subsequent break-up of Yugoslavia leading to Bosnia and Kosovo wars in nineties. Therefore, deep state antics were fervently deployed since the beginning of Clinton admin to force it to pursue security establishment’s agenda in the realm of defense and national security policy and foreign affairs.

Predictably, Clinton presidency began with a loud bang: 51-day siege of a compound belonging to a militant cult and the Waco massacre in Texas barely months after Mr. Clinton was inaugurated president in January 1993. Entire plot of the siege and subsequent slaughter was artfully choreographed with involvement of security agencies to create media frenzy and vilify Clinton admin for deploying excessive force against members of a religious community.

Waco massacre was the siege by US federal government and Texas state law enforcement officials of a compound belonging to the religious cult known as the Branch Davidians, between February 28 and April 19, 1993. The Branch Davidians, led by David Koresh, were headquartered at Mount Carmel Center ranch in McLennan County, Texas, 13 miles northeast of Waco.

In May 1992, Chief Deputy Daniel Weyenberg of the McLennan County Sheriff's Department called the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) to notify it that his office had been contacted by a local UPS representative concerned about a report by a local driver.

The UPS driver said a package had broken open on delivery to the Branch Davidian residence, revealing at least half a dozen grenades. He also noted that the compound had been receiving packages from an arms dealer for months. Paradoxically, as Texas was a backward region in medieval era, hence courier services lacked equipment to scan parcels for illegal firearms and explosives.

On pretext of Branch Davidian members hoarding illegal firearms, specifically prohibited automatic machine guns, ATF began surveillance from a house across the road from the compound several months before the siege. Their cover was poor, as ATF agents pretending to be “college students” were in their thirties. ATF also sent an undercover agent, Robert Rodriguez, whose identity Koresh learned, yet he displayed clemency and spared his life.

The ATF made a dubious claim that Koresh was possibly operating a methamphetamine lab, allowing it to obtain military assets under the war on drugs. Although the ATF's investigation "focused on firearm violations, not on illegal drugs," the ATF requested assistance from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the United States Department of Defense (DOD) "citing a drug connection."

The ATF had planned its raid for March 1, 1993, with the code name "Showtime." The ATF later claimed that the raid was moved up a day, to February 28, 1993, in response to the Waco Tribune-Herald's "The Sinful Messiah" article published on Feb. 27. Three helicopters of the Army National Guard were also deployed during the raid. As ATF agents scaled the walls of the building with ladders, a firefight ensued. During the first shots, Koresh was wounded, shot in the hand and the stomach.

ATF agent Chuck Hustmyre later wrote: "About 45 minutes into the shootout, the volume of gunfire finally started to slacken. We were running out of ammunition. The Davidians, however, had plenty." In all, four ATF agents were killed during the firefight, while another 16 were injured. Five Branch Davidians were also killed in the raid, while Michael Schroeder was shot dead by ATF agents, falsely alleging he fired a pistol at agents as he attempted to re-enter the compound with two Branch Davidian members.

Clearly, the poorly planned and equally ill-executed ATF raid at Branch Davidian headquarters was craftily orchestrated by the artful plotters to provoke and push members of the militant cult against the wall. After the killing of four ATF agents, surrendering to authorities was no longer an option, as armed militants would have been dealt harshly by law enforcement agencies.

“The siege was scary,” Derek Loveluck, a surviving British Branch Davidian member, recalls. “It was weird; you couldn’t move from this place for 51 days. We were all on edge. We thought they might come back and kill us all to get revenge for the death of the ATF agents.”

Consequently, Branch Davidian members had no choice but to resist arrest, leading to a 51-day siege of the compound that was widely publicized on American national media, as television viewers severely castigated militant cult as well as Clinton admin for the fiasco. The gruesome episode had such a profound and lasting impact on collective American consciousness that Oklahoma City bomber, Timothy McVeigh, cited Waco massacre as rationale for mounting the worst domestic terrorism attack on the second anniversary of the slaughter on April 19, 1995.

Shortly after the botched ATF raid on February 28, 1993, FBI took command of the siege of Branch Davidian compound, placing Jeff Jamar, head of the Bureau's San Antonio field office, in charge of the siege as Site Commander. The FBI Hostage Rescue Team (HRT) was headed by HRT Commander Richard Rogers, who had previously been criticized for his actions during the Ruby Ridge incident.

At first, the Davidians had telephone contact with local news media, and Koresh gave phone interviews. The FBI then cut off Davidian communication to the outside world. For the next 51 days, communication with those inside was by telephone by a group of 25 FBI negotiators.

During the siege, 35 Branch Davidian members, mainly children, were released. Two of the three water storage tanks on the roof of the main building had been damaged during the initial ATF raid. Eventually, the FBI cut all power and water to the compound, forcing those inside to survive on rainwater and stockpiled military MRE rations.

On April 9, the Director of the FBI, William Sessions, went to the newly appointed US Attorney General, Janet Reno, with a plan to flush out the Davidians with CS tear gas. For nine days, while the negotiators talked peace, the plan was being shuttled between officials in Washington. On April 18, the Attorney General informed President Clinton that she had approved the plan.

Outside the compound, nine M3 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles carrying M651 CS tear gas grenades and ferret rounds, and five M728 Combat Engineer Vehicles obtained from the US Army began patrolling. The armored vehicles were used to destroy perimeter fencing and outbuildings and crush cars belonging to the Branch Davidians. 

The assault took place on April 19, 1993. Because the Branch Davidians were heavily armed, the FBI Hostage Rescue Team's arms included .50 caliber (12.7 mm) rifles and armored Combat Engineering Vehicles (CEV). The CEVs used explosives to punch holes in the walls of buildings of the compound so they could pump in CS tear gas and try to force the Branch Davidians out.

The FBI Hostage Rescue Team delivered 40-millimeter Ferret brand CS gas rounds via M79 grenade launchers. Very early in the morning, the FBI Hostage Rescue Team fired two military M651 CS gas rounds at the Branch Davidian construction site. Around mid-morning, the FBI Hostage Rescue Team began to run low on 40 mm Ferret CS rounds and asked Texas Ranger Captain David Byrnes for CS gas rounds.

After more than six hours, no Branch Davidians had left the building, sheltering instead in an underground concrete block room "the bunker" within the building or using gas masks. At around noon, three fires broke out almost simultaneously in different parts of the building and spread quickly; footage of them was broadcast live by television crews.

Survivors said that they had piled hay-bales in front of the windows to keep out bullets during the siege and that, since their electricity had been cut off, they had been using oil lanterns all over the building. The tanks knocked the lanterns into the hay and their friends died simply because the flames spread like a nightmare through the dry wooden building.

Nine people left the building during the fire. The remaining Branch Davidians, including the children, were either buried alive by rubble, suffocated, or shot. Many were killed by smoke or carbon monoxide inhalation and other causes as fire engulfed the building. Autopsy records indicated that at least 20 Branch Davidians were shot, including Koresh and Steve Schneider, Koresh's deputy. In all, 76 people were slaughtered in cold blood.

The dust from Waco massacre hadn’t settled yet as another storm was brewing in Washington. It appears quite a coincidence that President Clinton sacked FBI director William Sessions on July 19, 1993, only a day before the alleged suicide of longtime Clinton friend and Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster on July 20.

Police discovered Foster dead from a gunshot wound to the head in Fort Marcy Park off the George Washington Memorial Parkway in Virginia outside Washington D.C. on July 20, 1993. Among his other duties, Foster helped prepare the tax returns of the Whitewater Development Corp., the controversial Arkansas real estate venture involving the Clintons.

By itself, Whitewater controversy was a trivial case of financial impropriety that wouldn’t have engendered much media furor. But it was the purported suicide of Vince Foster that provided impetus for Independent Counsel Ken Starr’s investigation into Whitewater scandal that then led to unearthing of Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky’s illicit affairs with Mr. Clinton and subsequent impeachment proceedings against the president for perjury.

The ground for smear campaign against President Clinton was prepared by David Brock after he published “Troopergate” scandal in American Spectator in December 1993, in which several Arkansas State Troopers claimed that they had arranged sexual liaisons for Arkansas governor Bill Clinton during his time in office.

Subsequently, a former Arkansas state employee, Paula Jones, sued President Bill Clinton for sexual harassment in May 1994. Jones claimed she kept quiet about the incident until 1994, when David Brock’s “Troopergate” story in The American Spectator magazine printed an account. Mr. Clinton was asked under oath about Monica Lewinsky in the Jones suit, he denied having ever had sexual relations with her, and was accused of perjury after evidence of sexual contact was exposed.

It is believed that President Clinton began a personal relationship with Lewinsky while she worked as intern at the White House, the details of which she later confided to Linda Tripp, her Defense Department co-worker who secretly recorded their telephone conversations.

In January 1998, Tripp discovered that Lewinsky had sworn an affidavit in the Paula Jones case, denying a relationship with Clinton. She delivered tapes to Ken Starr, the independent counsel who was investigating Clinton on other matters, including the Whitewater controversy and alleged suicide of Vince Foster.

Linda Tripp's action in illegally and secretly recording Monica Lewinsky's confidential phone calls about her relationship with President Bill Clinton caused a media sensation. The 20 hours of recordings became crucial to the Starr investigation.

Tripp became a close confidante of Monica Lewinsky while both were working in the Pentagon's public affairs office. After Lewinsky revealed to Tripp that she had been in a physical relationship with Clinton, Tripp, acting on the advice of the literary agent Lucianne Goldberg, began secretly recording phone conversations with Lewinsky. In January 1998, Tripp gave the tapes to Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr in exchange for immunity from prosecution for crime of wiretapping.

The catalyst for President Clinton’s impeachment was the Starr Report, a September 1998 report prepared by Ken Starr, Independent Counsel, for the House Judiciary Committee. The Starr Report included details outlining a sexual relationship between Clinton and Lewinsky.

Subsequently, on December 19, 1998, President Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives for perjury and obstruction of justice. On February 12, 1999, however, Mr. Clinton was acquitted on both counts by the Senate.

Despite spending eight tumultuous years in presidential office, Clintons should consider themselves fortunate for being spared the tragic fate that befell the Kennedy family. Purportedly, world’s most powerful office clearly isn’t a bed of roses, it’s a bed of thorns, with the double-edged sword of deep state perpetually hanging over the head of elected president.

Russiagate False Flag: How Deep State Sabotaged Clinton Campaign

Orchestrating the Russiagate hoax of fictitious ties between Trump campaign and Russia served two-fold objective: firstly, the Machiavellian stratagem was conceived to keep the rookie president and political maverick, considered Washington outsider, under the thumb of security establishment by hanging the sword of Mueller investigation over the head of President Trump for almost the entire duration of first Trump presidency; and secondly, the astutely crafted ploy was designed to sabotage Clinton campaign.

The schism between Hillary Clinton and security establishment was precipitated after the Benghazi attack at the American diplomatic compound in September 2012 that killed United States Ambassador to Libya and three other Americans, while Clinton was serving as secretary of state. 

Shadowy puppeteers pulling the strings of docile politicians could’ve eliminated Clinton during Democratic presidential primaries, but the intractable conundrum resourceful overlords faced was Democratic runner-up Comrade Bernie was equally despised by deep state due to his phony idealism.

Therefore, elusive bosses of Cosa Nostra waited until the election year of 2016 to unleash a barrage of politically damaging scandals at Clinton campaign that left it in absolute tatters in the run-up to presidential elections, thus leaving the race open for a dark horse, trailing far behind in opinion polls, to emerge triumphant in presidential contest.

At the same time, however, secretive choreographers cunningly camouflaged the nefarious plot to sabotage Clinton campaign by shifting the blame for smear campaign that plagued Clinton campaign in the run-up to presidential elections at Democrats’ political rival Trump campaign and security establishment’s arch-foe Russia by deliberately creating the smokescreen of Russia’s alleged interference in US presidential elections on Mr. Trump’s behalf. 

Being a Democrat himself, President Obama obviously favored Democratic presidential candidate Clinton, but all of Obama admin’s intel czars, including FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan and DNI James Clapper, were clandestinely onboard the deep state’s subversive agenda of undermining Clinton campaign, though ostensibly pledging allegiance to Democratic admin.

This was precisely the reason Comey sprang an “October surprise,” on the explicit instructions of shadowy bosses of security establishment, by reopening the investigation into Clinton’s use of private email server for official correspondence on October 28, 2016, eleven days before the election, hence costing Clinton the coveted presidential office.

During the election year, deep state had inserted covert teams of informants into Clinton campaign, Democratic National Committee and even in the offices of Democratic congressmen, tasked with stealing compromising information that was then made public, while pointing fingers at Russian hackers for alleged interference in US presidential elections in support of Mr. Trump’s presidential bid.

Before the hacking of Podesta emails and purported DNC cyberattacks, an entire cell of informants was busted in March 2016 by law enforcement agencies at Capitol Hill, which was allegedly providing “technical support” to over 30 House Democrats, but thanks to complicity of establishment media, scant media attention was paid to the team of saboteurs that was caught red-handed while stealing compromising information from Democratic lawmakers.

In March 2016, House auditors noticed some purchases for computer equipment were broken into multiple parts and left off the House inventory. Some of this equipment was delivered to the ringleader of the covert cell of IT technicians Imran Awan’s brothers’ house.

In February 2017, the Sergeant-at-Arms briefed top staffers for members of Congress that the U.S. Capitol Police were conducting an active criminal investigation into the actions of five House IT employees, Pakistani American Awan, his wife Hina Alvi, his two brothers and a friend were named as the IT staffers being investigated.

Given the suspected violations, most of the congress members immediately terminated Awan's services. In July 2017, Awan was arrested on federal bank fraud charges. In August 2018, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan sentenced Awan to time served and three months of supervision, thus the matter was buried lest the intrusion into Democratic lawmakers’ computer networks whips up a political maelstrom in the run-up to scandal-infested presidential election.

Leaving the media hysteria of Russia’s alleged interference in US elections aside, to be clear, Russian hackers never had access to computer networks of Clinton campaign and DNC. Guccifer 2.0 and “cozy and cuddly bears” were simply myths perpetuated by establishment media at the behest of elusive puppeteers pulling the strings. Alleged hackings of Podesta emails and DNC servers were inside jobs done on the instructions of “Bald Eagle.”

According to dubious mainstream narrative, Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta received an email on March 19, 2016, with the subject line: "Someone has your password," that appeared to be from Google. The email was forwarded to a campaign IT staffer who, despite some initial suspicion, mistakenly informed the team the email was "legitimate," when they reportedly meant to type “illegitimate.” Upon learning the fabricated cover-up, Julian Assange sarcastically quipped the phishing attack appeared a job not of an accomplished hacker but a puerile prank of a 14-year-old novice.

Besides the Awan cell at offices of Democratic Congressmen and the Clinton campaign cell that leaked Podesta emails, there was another team of informants tasked with stealing politically damaging information at Democratic National Committee’s headquarters in Washington. 27-year-old Seth Rich, who was murdered during an allegedly botched robbery on July 10, 2016, was a member of DNC cell.

Rich and his team had illicitly obtained thousands of emails from DNC servers. On July 22, just 12 days after Rich was killed, WikiLeaks published internal DNC emails that appeared to show top party officials conspired to stop Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont from becoming the party’s presidential nominee.

That controversy resulted in Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s resignation as DNC chairperson. DNC CEO Amy Dacey, CFO Brad Marshall, and Communications Director Luis Miranda also resigned in the wake of the controversy and the entire Clinton campaign was left in utter disarray.

After stealing emails from DNC servers, Rich passed on the compromising information to his handlers. But he made the fatal mistake of defying instructions and storing a copy of data in a thumb drive. He was in contact with journalists for selling the kompromat for millions of dollars.

But this avaricious attitude could’ve spoiled the entire game plan, as the deep state wanted the politically damaging information to appear on Russia-aligned news outlets first, not on American media organizations, in order to implicate fictitious Russian hackers for sabotaging Clinton campaign, hence perpetuating the myth of Russian interference in US elections on Mr. Trump’s behalf.

Thus, on the fateful night of July 10, 2016, after Rich left a bar at 1:30 a.m. to take a 1.8 mile stroll to his residence at the Bloomingdale neighborhood of Washington, he was approached by a pair of muggers belonging to security establishment. Initially, the assailants attempted to persuade him to hand over the thumb drive, about the existence of which deep state henchmen became aware after Rich’s colleagues in DNC cell snitched on him.

Following Rich’s repeated refusal to admit wrongdoing, a scuffle broke out, leaving his face and knuckles bruised, and he was also shot with two bullets in the back. Purported muggers didn’t take anything besides the valuable thumb drive and immediately fled the crime scene, while 27-year-old Seth Rich breathed his last an hour and a half later in a hospital.

After obtaining politically damaging kompromat on Clinton campaign, the next logical step was leaking the information to mainstream media in a manner that could’ve implicated traditional rival Russia. Therefore, contrary to popular perception, American IT professionals on the payroll of deep state, not Russian hackers, created Guccifer 2.0 persona and set up DC Leaks website hosted at THCservers.

Although American hackers masquerading as Russian intelligence operatives began leaking politically damaging information on Clinton campaign in mid-June 2016 via relatively obscure websites, the scandalous information wasn’t getting as much publicity as it deserved. But astute plotters of nefarious scheme were anticipating the dramatic entrance of a usual whistleblower that had the compulsive habit of poking its nose into covert affairs of security establishment.

Predictably, WikiLeaks reached out to Guccifer 2.0, and pitched WikiLeaks as the best outlet for the hacked material. On July 14, 2016, Guccifer 2.0 sent WikiLeaks an encrypted one-gigabyte file named “wk dnc link I .txt.gpg.” Wikileaks confirmed receipt, and on July 22, it published 20,000 DNC emails, driving last nail into coffin of Clinton campaign.

After categorically debunking the myth of alleged Russian interference in US elections, let’s now discuss a few minutiae that curious readers might find puzzling. Joseph Mifsud’s meeting with Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos in a London restaurant on April 26, 2016, in which Mifsud claimed Russians had dirt on Clinton, is often cited as conclusive proof of Russian interference in US elections.

But I’ve already elaborated in detail in series of posts on Russiagate hoax that Mifsud was a British MI6 agent masquerading as Maltese professor. While George Papadopoulos and Carter Page were hired by Trump campaign as purported foreign policy advisers in March 2016 and sacked in August and September, respectively.

Both were deep states moles inserted into Trump campaign in order to incriminate it for having clandestine contacts with Russia, hence hanging the sword of Russiagate probe over the head of President Trump for almost the entire duration of first Trump presidency in order to compel it to toe security establishment’s agenda, lest the president too falls prey to sweeping Mueller investigation.

Finally, Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, Donald Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner participated in a meeting with Russian attorney Natalia Veselnitskaya and several others at Trump Tower on June 9, 2016. The meeting was apparently arranged by Rob Goldstone, a British publicist and music manager, who appears to be a compulsive braggart as his “dirt on Clinton” turned out to be nothing more than making mountain out of molehill.

Contrary to perception of illicit collusion between Trump campaign and Russia created by mainstream media, the agenda of the meeting was entirely different. Veselnitskaya was on a visit to New York for a court appearance on June 9 and was assiduously working for the repeal Magnitsky Act that had imposed sanctions on Russian entities.

Also on June 9, prior to and following the Trump Tower meeting, Veselnitskaya met with Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn R. Simpson, ostensibly related to hearings that involved their mutual client Russian oligarch Denis Katsyv. Notably, Fusion GPS was the same firm that hired former MI6 agent Christopher Steele to do “opposition research” on Trump campaign and produce infamous Steele dossier.

The information that Russian lawyer brought with her when she met Trump campaign representatives in June 2016 stemmed from research conducted by Fusion GPS. Veselnitskaya said she first received the supposedly incriminating information she brought to Trump Tower — describing alleged tax evasion and donations to Democrats — from Glenn Simpson.

Starting in 2014, Simpson and Veselnitskaya had both worked on the same side of the Prevezon case, in which the Justice Department accused the Cyprus-based Russian company owned by Russian oligarch Denis Katsyv of laundering hundreds of millions of dollars via New York real estate.

Months before she met with Trump campaign representatives in June 2016, Veselnitskaya said she turned the information she got from Simpson over to Russian Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika. In May 2016, the Russian prosecutor general issued a statement seeking U.S. help in investigating what he described as a tax evasion scheme involving the Ziff brothers, American investors, and British investor Bill Browder.

She reportedly provided NBC News with a document in November 2017 she said she had prepared for the Trump Tower meeting, in which Clinton was mentioned in reference to contributions from the Ziff brothers, whom she accused of evading Russian taxes. She believed that some of the money they reaped from doing that ended up supporting Clinton and the Democrats, and she wanted the Trump campaign to know that.

“Veselnitskaya also discussed what she believed was incriminating information about Bill Browder, a British billionaire who has been the chief advocate for the Magnitsky Act, a U.S. law that sanctions alleged Russian human rights violators. Browder is a businessman who made a fortune investing in post-Soviet Russia and was a supporter of Vladimir Putin until he was kicked out of the country in 2005, accused of evading $40 million in taxes.

“Browder renounced his U.S. citizenship in 1997. His account of what he said the Russian government did to Magnitsky, whom he described as his employee, triggered international outrage, and led Congress to pass the Magnitsky Act.

“Simpson, who is a former Wall Street Journal reporter, was paid to dig into Browder by a law firm representing Denis Katsyv, the owner of Prevezon. Prevezon settled the U.S. money-laundering lawsuit in May 2017 — with no admission of wrongdoing — by agreeing to pay $6 million.

“’According to available information, the Ziff Brothers were involved in funding both of Obama's election campaigns and have been dubbed by the media as Democrats’ sponsors,’ Veselnitskaya wrote in a Russian language document translated by NBC News. ‘They are possibly involved in funding Hillary Clinton's campaign, too.’”

This was the purportedly “sensational revelation” conveyed to Trump campaign by Russian attorney at the Trump Tower meeting that corporate media hyped for political point-scoring and gave goosebumps to gullible American audience that Russia had interfered in US elections while overlooking evident political engineering by deep state during the presidential election.